On Monday, 19 Feb 2001, Roger Leigh wrote:
> I mailed this patch to the list a few weeks ago, but it was ignored.
Your patch sounds useful, and I think it should probably be applied.
However, it seems that everyone is busy right now.
Thanks for persisting!
Austin
_
On Saturday, 17 Feb 2001, Robert L Krawitz wrote:
> This raises questions of how to package it with the
> Gimp. The Gimp could certainly distribute the whole package with it,
> but it's quite large. It could also be treated like JPEG and only
> built if the underlying libgimpprint exists on the
Several months ago, there was a discussion about RGB vs RGBA images,
and why the background layer was "special" and required the option
"Add Alpha Channel". IIRC, the conclusions were:
- because it saves memory -- which is useful for huge images, but it only
makes sense if you disable undo and
NEW AND EXCITING!! WOMENS VIAGRA!!
http://www.geocities.com/new2000dollarr
___
Gimp-developer mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer
Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2001 10:30:56 +
From: Austin Donnelly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
I think the easiest thing is to have the version in CVS (and gimp
snapshots) to include the code for the shared library, and an
integrated build system. I'd even go so far to say that the plugin
sho
On Tue, 20 Feb 2001, Sven Neumann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Raphael Quinet) writes:
[...]
> > Consider the following cases, which should all produce a file with
> > transparency, if the File->Save plug-ins were working as the user
> > would expect:
> > - Create a new image, u
___
Gimp-developer mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer
On Tuesday, 20 Feb 2001, Robert L Krawitz wrote:
>Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2001 10:30:56 +
>From: Austin Donnelly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>I think the easiest thing is to have the version in CVS (and gimp
>snapshots) to include the code for the shared library, and an
>integrated b
Austin Donnelly wrote:
> ...
> Well, maybe just 3:
> libgimpprint
> print plugin (both of these manually imported to gimp cvs)
> CPUS + Ghostscript drivers
The CUPS and Ghostscript drivers shouldn't be combined... It
would be pretty easy to add the CUPS driver to the main CUPS
distribution
On Tue, Feb 20, 2001 at 02:13:28PM +, Austin Donnelly wrote:
> On Tuesday, 20 Feb 2001, Robert L Krawitz wrote:
> > This would total four (libgimpprint and associated tests, the
> > plugin, the CUPS driver, and the Ghostscript driver), plus possibly
> > other packages for things like Debian an
> > For Gimp 2.0, how much of it will be Bonoboized?
>
> We have not yet decided if we want to bonoboize something at all, but
> mostly due to the fact that noone I talked to so far could explain what
> this would mean in particular.
Bonobo support could come in many different shapes.
A 60
11 matches
Mail list logo
