Same thing happend to me when I announced on a forum I created a program named
RIOT (an acronym of Radical Image Optimization Tool).
Some people pointed that the name is not good. Quote: The name is not good. It
conveys the impression that the program will make a right mess of users'
images.
Hi
I am new to gimp plug-in development.
I wanted to know how mouse clicks are handled and also how coordinated for
the mouse pointer position are retrieved (similar to what the pointer dialog
does).
I suspect it is something to do with GTK/GDK (GDKCursor?), but i am not sure
how it works
On Fri, 2009-10-30 at 10:02 +0100, Niranjan wrote:
Hi
I am new to gimp plug-in development.
I wanted to know how mouse clicks are handled and also how coordinated for
the mouse pointer position are retrieved (similar to what the pointer dialog
does).
I suspect it is something to do
On Fri, Oct 30, 2009 at 9:43 AM, Brendan mailingl...@endosquid.com wrote:
On Thursday 29 October 2009, you wrote:
On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 2:07 PM, Brendan mailingl...@endosquid.com wrote:
All the above comprise a significant factor in why forks are regarded,
at best, as a necessary evil. All
On Fri, Oct 30, 2009 at 12:40 PM, David Gowers 00a...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Oct 30, 2009 at 9:43 AM, Brendan mailingl...@endosquid.com wrote:
A list of files that would need modification:
... SINP LONG LIST...
And all of GIMP code. 98% functions are prefixed as gimp. You can try
to grep for
if it were more canonical, people would already be calling it Gnu IMP
or IMP). That's fair enough.. IMP *is* a better name (and people who
object to it on religious grounds probably are terminally humorless),
Actually I think there are quite a few people who would be more open
to using the
I honestly don't see the problem people have with the word.
My school-age daughter came home talking about using gimp in school.
I thought great, a progressive schoolboard willing to use open source software.
Alas, she was referring to gimp, the plastic craft lace. Also known
as boondoggle
Monty Montgomery wrote:
Actually I think there are quite a few people who would be more open
to using the Gimp if the development community were screened for
religious preferences. I don't see why it's OK to offend the
Christian users, but not ok to offend just the 'prudes'.
We could fork
On Fri, Oct 30, 2009 at 09:13:55AM -0400, Monty Montgomery wrote:
We could fork the project to only include Christian developers,
thus... uh... you all *are* getting this is sarcasm, right?
Way OT, but speaking of getting in trouble with acronyms, I remember
years ago at law school when
On Fri, Oct 30, 2009 at 4:53 PM, Scott drmem...@3rivers.net wrote:
Way OT, but speaking of getting in trouble with acronyms, I remember
years ago at law school when someone founded a Christian Legal
Association there, and they would post bulletins on the
walls. Somebody (hmmm, wonder who?...)
Alexia Death wrote:
On Fri, Oct 30, 2009 at 12:40 PM, David Gowers 00a...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Oct 30, 2009 at 9:43 AM, Brendan mailingl...@endosquid.com wrote:
A list of files that would need modification:
... SINP LONG LIST...
And all of GIMP code. 98% functions are prefixed as gimp.
On Fri, Oct 30, 2009 at 6:26 PM, Christopher Howard chow...@indicium.us wrote:
People keep saying the original developers named it GIMP and that is
that. Every heard, though, of the original name of the Linux OS?
Torvalds wanted it called Freaxs. Fortunately, though, the name Linux
stuck, and
On Sat, Oct 31, 2009 at 8:56 AM, Christopher Howard chow...@indicium.us wrote:
Alexia Death wrote:
On Fri, Oct 30, 2009 at 12:40 PM, David Gowers 00a...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Oct 30, 2009 at 9:43 AM, Brendan mailingl...@endosquid.com wrote:
A list of files that would need modification:
...
On Fri, 2009-10-30 at 13:06 +0200, Alexia Death wrote:
Some English speakers
discomfort at the name is getting a bit ridiculous IMHO.
These words make me squirm.
fag - a pile of sticks (secondary meaning, rarely used)
nigger - a person from a poor background (secondary meaning, almost
unheard
guys,
would like to tap the wisdom of this crowd here.
say I have made a selection in GIMP, done what needed to be done to the
pixels in the selection and now want to get rid of the selection.
the obvious way is Select-None.
how many more ways are there?
--ps
founder +
Stephen Griffiths wrote:
On Fri, 2009-10-30 at 13:06 +0200, Alexia Death wrote:
Some English speakers
discomfort at the name is getting a bit ridiculous IMHO.
These words make me squirm.
fag - a pile of sticks (secondary meaning, rarely used)
nigger - a person from a poor
On Sat, Oct 31, 2009 at 10:59 AM, peter sikking pe...@mmiworks.net wrote:
guys,
would like to tap the wisdom of this crowd here.
say I have made a selection in GIMP, done what needed to be done to the
pixels in the selection and now want to get rid of the selection.
the obvious way is
On Sat, 2009-10-31 at 01:29 +0100, peter sikking wrote:
how many more ways are there?
ctrl+shift+a
___
Gimp-developer mailing list
Gimp-developer@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU
https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer
On Fri, Oct 30, 2009 at 7:37 PM, David Gowers 00a...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Oct 31, 2009 at 10:59 AM, peter sikking pe...@mmiworks.net wrote:
guys,
would like to tap the wisdom of this crowd here.
say I have made a selection in GIMP, done what needed to be done to the
pixels in the
On Sat, 2009-10-31 at 01:29 +0100, peter sikking wrote:
the obvious way is Select-None.
how many more ways are there?
Save the image as png, quit gimp and restart. :D
go to channels dialogue, make an empty channel, and do,
channel to selection. (and then go to layers and select
a layer in
On Sat, Oct 31, 2009 at 12:30 PM, Liam R E Quin l...@holoweb.net wrote:
On Sat, 2009-10-31 at 01:29 +0100, peter sikking wrote:
the obvious way is Select-None.
how many more ways are there?
Save the image as png, quit gimp and restart. :D
go to channels dialogue, make an empty channel,
Christopher Howard-3 wrote:
Its about having a product you aren't afraid to advertise. . As soon
as I say GIMP, you can see
the doubt on their faces, because they associate the word with being
weak or lame.
I agree with this. Many people shy away from using products that aren't
vabijou2 wrote:
Christopher Howard-3 wrote:
Its about having a product you aren't afraid to advertise. . As soon
as I say GIMP, you can see
the doubt on their faces, because they associate the word with being
weak or lame.
I agree with this. Many people shy away from using
23 matches
Mail list logo
