On 03/12/11 00:03, Bogdan Szczurek wrote:
It seems most promising!
Best regards!
thebodzio
___
Gimp-developer mailing list
Gimp-developer@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU
https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer
What seems
On 03/12/11 00:03, Bogdan Szczurek wrote:
It seems most promising!
Best regards!
thebodzio
___
Gimp-developer mailing list
Gimp-developer@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU
https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer
What
Dear Dr. Terry:
I find it interesting that you and your group decided to use task
set instead of (solution) stack, the standard FLOSS descriptor
for sets of tools tailored to a specific task.
Smart move, given that the goal, I would assume, is to help everyone!
Reference:
Dear Dr. Terry:
On a more humorous note, it would appear to me that a good logo for
AdaptableGIMP would be Wilber with an eye patch, suggesting that the
main idea is to make only part of the interface visible (in a task
dependent way).
Nicolas Robidoux
Hi,
According to the GIMP Roadmap, it seems to take time very much for the
CMYK support to be added to the GIMP.
Now we can use the separate+ plug-in, but I think that the separate+
plug-in is not proper for the GIMP distribution because the separate+
plug-in has unnecessary features for general
On Sat, Mar 12, 2011 at 5:15 PM, Yoshinori Yamakawa
y...@yellowmagic.info wrote:
Hi,
According to the GIMP Roadmap, it seems to take time very much for the
CMYK support to be added to the GIMP.
Now we can use the separate+ plug-in, but I think that the separate+
plug-in is not proper for
