Hi,
Henrik Brix Andersen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Tue, 2003-06-24 at 19:16, Joao S. O. Bueno wrote:
>> Where have teh GAP filters gone in the 1.3.x tree?
>
> GAP has been moved to the gimp-gab cvs module.
cvs module "gimp-gap" of course
There are inofficial CVS snapshots on http://sven.
On Tue, 2003-06-24 at 19:16, Joao S. O. Bueno wrote:
> Where have teh GAP filters gone in the 1.3.x tree?
GAP has been moved to the gimp-gab cvs module.
Sincerely,
./Brix
--
Henrik Brix Andersen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
___
Gimp-developer mailing list
[EMA
Hello ...
Where have teh GAP filters gone in the 1.3.x tree?
I've found them in the plug-ins->gap in the 1.2.x,
and I am intending to modify the "filter all layers", to do aply another
filter with variable parameters based on the Value information of a
mapping drawable.
Easy to do, and powerf
Hi,
David Neary <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Just to inform peopel who aren't following CVS or Bugzilla, Exif
> support (of a kind) has been added to HEAD.
There's more nice stuff being added to CVS such as a grid and
persistent text layers. I will try not to wait too long with the
1.3.16 relea
Hi,
Hans Breuer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > But perhaps this just means that the Undo system needs to be
> > hooked into the PDB as well ?!
>
> It would certainly be useful to have that capability. Though if
> the user is used to macro recording he would probably be able
> to change the brush
Does anybody know what is happening with the archives of the various
GIMP mailing lists? I tried to have a look at them while I had no
direct e-mail access during my long week-end, but the archives were 4
days late. On Sunday, they only contained the messages sent on
Thursday morning. As of this
Hi all,
Just to inform peopel who aren't following CVS or Bugzilla, Exif
support (of a kind) has been added to HEAD.
If you have libexif installed, you can now conserve exif data
stored with a jpeg across GIMP edits. There are no interface
bells and whistles, no metadata editor, no exif data edi
On Mon, 23 Jun 2003 22:40:56 +0200, Hans Breuer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> At 07:01 23.06.03 -0700, Nathan Carl Summers wrote:
> >On Fri, 20 Jun 2003, Hans Breuer wrote:
> >> (try to guess the call stack depth to avoid recording functions
> >>called by a plug-in)
> >
> >I had a solution to
[already sent off-list by mistake]
At 17:15 23.06.03 +0200, Sven Neumann wrote:
>Hi,
>
>Nathan Carl Summers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>>> In short the approach (more info in bugzilla) :
>>> - Intercept every PDB call if a macro recorder instance is running.
>>
>> The cvs version of Libpdb alrea
