On Wed, Aug 20, 2003 at 12:38:23PM +0200, "Steinar H. Gunderson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> FWIW, I just checked -- the latest version (as of Debian unstable) of lynx
> can handle the UTF-8 on my page correctly, w3m can't.
Well, w3m can't handle html in most cases anyways, and there are far
bet
On Wed, Aug 20, 2003 at 03:52:09AM +0200, Daniel Egger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The IEs had troubles until somewhen (haven't checked for quite some
Are you sure? In my experience all of these problems stem from improper or
missing charset declarations.
> time). Also the smaller homegrown brow
On Wed, Aug 20, 2003 at 03:52:09AM +0200, Daniel Egger wrote:
> The IEs had troubles until somewhen (haven't checked for quite some
> time). Also the smaller homegrown browsers did, probably also the old
> GIMP helpbrowser. And I'm not sure about lynx and w3c either. Usually
> one doesn't notice be
Am Mit, 2003-08-20 um 11.19 schrieb Michael Natterer:
> >
> >
> >
> >
> Wow, that was fast :)
> for completeness, this morning's discussion with roman on #gimp:
Wow, this is going to be a lot of typing overhead... ;)
What about we do the prefixing when we settled for a naming conventio
Daniel Egger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Am Mit, 2003-08-20 um 00.47 schrieb Michael Natterer:
>
>> Is this a solution everybody can live with or did I miss something
>> obvious? If it sounds reasonable, we should go ahead, it's not even
>> an awful lot of work (the coding part, not writing the
