Re: [Gimp-developer] GEGL alive?
On 7/1/05, Jan Prach <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi Gimps, > Is GEGL alive or not? GeGL is alive, and unlike say, six months ago, is not even in a coma. :) > I like gimp. I feel very limited by 8 bit color depth in gimp for a > quite some time. I'm going to start my diploma thesis. It'll be about > HDR (high dynamic range) images. If the idea of GEGL is alive I'd like > very much to contribute. Excellent! > I've read that you have realized 8bits are not enough for the future > during the GUADEC. Than I saw some activity in GEGL cvs. I've also read > something about gggl. I'd like to see those ideas working in gimp. GIMP is currently understaffed and has been for a while. But we definately are still committed to getting gegl to be more than a pipe dream. Actually, a directed acyclic graph dream. > The question is: Are you going to move gimp forward with GEGL or just > dispute KDEification? Well, try not to put it as a mutually exclusive choice. Flamewars are so much fun, you know. :) Rockwalrus ___ Gimp-developer mailing list Gimp-developer@lists.xcf.berkeley.edu http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer
[Gimp-developer] Feedback on Summer of Google
Hi all, Someone (Michael Schumacher, I think) pinged me on IRC asking if I had any news on the google projects awards. As you know, we weren't in the list of sponsoring projects, so we added some ideas at the very end (the day before the closing date) to the GNOME proposals. Since GNOME kind of fumbled the ball on the Google thing too, there are (to my knowledge) no GIMP related projects chosen as part of GNOME's quota, and there are no standalone GIMP projects either. I've been in touch with Chris DiBona, and hopefully next time we'll be involved, and both GIMP and GNOME will be better represented. Cheers, Dave. -- David Neary [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ Gimp-developer mailing list Gimp-developer@lists.xcf.berkeley.edu http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer
