On 04/03/10 21:22, Jason Simanek wrote:
... elision by patrick...
Thanks to browser type #2 I can only use color profiles on images that
are not intended to be a part of the web site's design. If I do include
color profiles on those images, every time I bring up the site in Safari
it will
On Fri, 2010-03-05 at 20:22 +0100, Martin Nordholts wrote:
On 03/05/2010 03:20 AM, Luiz Felipe Moraes Pereira wrote:
Hi again, the original discussion is in the link below:
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=611758
I was advised to present this idea here, what do you think?
Hi,
On Fri, 2010-03-05 at 07:34 +, Omari Stephens wrote:
Finally, to respond to your question on the bug, we need some way to
embed an actual sRGB profile into an image.
Can't we just embed the lcms built-in sRGB profile? That sounds like a
totally straight-forward solution. But I might
On Saturday 06 March 2010 14:56:21 Sven Neumann wrote:
To me, having the layers dialog scroll to a seemingly random place after
deleting a layer is a clear usability problem. A user should not have to
worry about what layer that was previously selected when deleting a
layer.
Perhaps the
On Sat, 2010-03-06 at 13:56 +0100, Sven Neumann wrote:
On Fri, 2010-03-05 at 20:22 +0100, Martin Nordholts wrote:
On 03/05/2010 03:20 AM, Luiz Felipe Moraes Pereira wrote:
Hi again, the original discussion is in the link below:
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=611758
I was
On 02/27/2010 03:14 PM, Jon Nordby wrote:
Sets lower compression and disables interlacing.
On a 5 layer image of 4500x6000px this gives an order of magnitude better
save-times, with 50% increase in file size.
Hi Jon
Sorry for the late follow-up and thanks for maintaining the ORA plug-in.
50%
On Sat, 2010-03-06 at 15:30 +0100, Martin Nordholts wrote:
On 02/27/2010 03:14 PM, Jon Nordby wrote:
Sets lower compression and disables interlacing.
On a 5 layer image of 4500x6000px this gives an order of magnitude better
save-times, with 50% increase in file size.
Hi Jon
Sorry for
On Sat, 2010-03-06 at 16:35 +0100, Sven Neumann wrote:
[...]
IMO 50% increase in file size is not much for a file format that is
meant for archival and exchange of images.
Archival - it'd mean an extra 20 gigabytes to back up for one of
my old books archives for example.
Interchange - the
