Hi everyone,
May I ask someone to give me some feedback about a patch I posted
dealing with bug n° 612931 ?
I probably not understood something ... but I recently checked it
again, and according to me, it does
the trick : allowing the move tool to move individual layer inside a
layer group (
On 03/14/2011 11:59 AM, Joao S. O. Bueno wrote:
Hi,
This decision, as I see it, change the release date from within
months to within some weeks -
May I ask for the calculations that led you to the conclusion that we
are weeks away from a release? I haven't done the math yet, but I still
On 15 March 2011 07:43, Martin Nordholts ense...@gmail.com wrote:
Not including API to work with layer groups in Python is not a
regression, it's just missing functionality in one of the scripting
languages. It is unfortunate if GIMP 2.8 will be released without layer
groups support in Python,
On Tue, Mar 15, 2011 at 4:43 AM, Martin Nordholts ense...@gmail.com wrote:
On 03/14/2011 11:59 AM, Joao S. O. Bueno wrote:
Hi,
This decision, as I see it, change the release date from within
months to within some weeks -
May I ask for the calculations that led you to the conclusion that we
On Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 1:59 PM, Joao S. O. Bueno wrote:
Hi,
This decision, as I see it, change the release date from within
months to within some weeks -
I hope you have in mind that Translators have to know about so they
can update translations as possible, as well. At some reasonable
On 03/15/2011 10:44 AM, Jon Nordby wrote:
On 15 March 2011 07:43, Martin Nordholtsense...@gmail.com wrote:
Not including API to work with layer groups in Python is not a
regression, it's just missing functionality in one of the scripting
languages. It is unfortunate if GIMP 2.8 will be
On 03/15/2011 12:35 PM, Joao S. O. Bueno wrote:
Scripts which previously interated through layers are currently not
working. That is a regression.
It sure sounds like one, please file a bug report and put it on the 2.8
milestone with a scripts that allows the regression to be easily
On 03/15/2011 02:12 PM, Alexandre Prokoudine wrote:
On Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 1:59 PM, Joao S. O. Bueno wrote:
Hi,
This decision, as I see it, change the release date from within
months to within some weeks -
I hope you have in mind that Translators have to know about so they
can update
On Tue, Mar 15, 2011 at 8:25 PM, Martin Nordholts wrote:
Speaking of which, I'd love to know what on Earth the reasoning behind
putting https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=556884 off the
milestones is supposed to mean. The prerequisite is in place, making
the messages translatable is
On 03/15/2011 06:38 PM, Alexandre Prokoudine wrote:
On Tue, Mar 15, 2011 at 8:25 PM, Martin Nordholts wrote:
Speaking of which, I'd love to know what on Earth the reasoning behind
putting https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=556884 off the
milestones is supposed to mean. The
FYI, I have code to fix #596410, following the guidelines Martin gave
me, but I don't want to submit that patch until I can actually compile
Gimp again.
Eric
On 03/14/2011 04:22 AM, Martin Nordholts wrote:
Hi everyone,
As you all know, getting 2.8 out is highest priority right now. There
11 matches
Mail list logo
