Re: [Gimp-developer] Re: Raphael's edits, was Re: test this howto now
On Mon, 21 Jan 2002 13:43:51 -0500 Carol Spears [EMAIL PROTECTED] sent: syngin, can we make a date and write this how to together? i just have a feeling that i can fake it like that first time again better than you. i have some ideas about what should go into it. we can write gimp-howto-build-stable-tarball together, assume it is being used by a person who has never compiled a package before. step through compiling one library as an example (i say png since some distro or another had trouble with this lately and also png is so pc). make them read the freakin first paragraph of man ldconfig. and talk about why you choose /usr or /usr/local as a destination for The GIMP and what the pitfalls of each decision might be. when is a good time for you? we can build it and write it together, maybe? carol Anytime (like now) is fine. -- http://syngin.homelinux.org mailto: syngin at gimp.org http://syngin.gimp.no mailto: syngin at gimp.no UNIX gives you enough rope to shoot yourself in the foot ___ Gimp-developer mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer
Re: [Gimp-developer] Re: Raphael's edits, was Re: test this howto now
On 21 Jan 2002, at 13:32, Carol Spears wrote: On 2002-01-21 at 1920.13 +0100, Sven Neumann typed this mail: ack. The Compile The GIMP from CVS HOWTO should refer to the Compile The GIMP from source HOWTO and focus on the possible pitfalls that compiling from CVS adds (cvs, aclocal, autoconf, automake). hmm. gimp-howtos-build-stable-tarball gimp-howtos-build-stable-cvs gimp-howtos-build-unstable-tarball gimp-howtos-build-unstable-cvs do you ack at this? Aren't gimp-howtos-build-unstable-tarball and gimp-howtos-build- unstable-cvs just: Pester Sven or Mitch until you find out what they broke last night and how to route around that.? ;-) Anyhow, that brings me to one thing: perhaps the current CVS-howto should have links to other, more generic compilation-, shell- and CVS- howtos. -- branko collin [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ Gimp-developer mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer
Re: [Gimp-developer] Re: Raphael's edits, was Re: test this howto now
Hi, Branko Collin [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On 21 Jan 2002, at 13:32, Carol Spears wrote: On 2002-01-21 at 1920.13 +0100, Sven Neumann typed this mail: ack. The Compile The GIMP from CVS HOWTO should refer to the Compile The GIMP from source HOWTO and focus on the possible pitfalls that compiling from CVS adds (cvs, aclocal, autoconf, automake). hmm. gimp-howtos-build-stable-tarball gimp-howtos-build-stable-cvs gimp-howtos-build-unstable-tarball gimp-howtos-build-unstable-cvs do you ack at this? Aren't gimp-howtos-build-unstable-tarball and gimp-howtos-build- unstable-cvs just: Pester Sven or Mitch until you find out what they broke last night and how to route around that.? ;-) I guess you are joking but I want to state this nevertheless: The version from CVS should always build and indeed it does so almost all of the time. If someone has trouble to build we ask you to pester whoever might have broken the build (check the ChangeLog!). If there's an obvious fix and you have CVS write access, please go ahead and commit the change without waiting for approval. We can always do the right fix later if yours turned out to be wrong. Salut, Sven ___ Gimp-developer mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer
