[Gimp-developer] [PATCH 4/4] Tile caching performance patches

2009-06-02 Thread Christopher Montgomery 
Patch attached [to avoid any chance of gmail mangling lines]

Detailed patch description at:
http://web.mit.edu/xiphmont/Public/gimp-fu/gimp-cache.html

Monty


0004-Correct-startup-flaw-in-idle-swapper-start-Don-t-wat.patch
Description: Binary data
___
Gimp-developer mailing list
Gimp-developer@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU
https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer

Re: [Gimp-developer] [PATCH 4/4] Tile caching performance patches

2009-06-02 Thread Sven Neumann 
Hi,

On Tue, 2009-06-02 at 04:13 -0400, Christopher Montgomery wrote:

 -#define IDLE_SWAPPER_TIMEOUT  250
 -
 +#define IDLE_SWAPPER_START 1000
 +#define IDLE_SWAPPER_INTERVAL  20
 +#define IDLE_SWAPPER_TILES_PER 10

Should that constant perhaps better be called
IDLE_SWAPPER_TILES_PER_RUN ?


Sven


___
Gimp-developer mailing list
Gimp-developer@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU
https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer

Re: [Gimp-developer] [PATCH 4/4] Tile caching performance patches

2009-06-02 Thread Christopher Montgomery 
On Tue, Jun 2, 2009 at 5:01 PM, Sven Neumann s...@gimp.org wrote:
 Hi,

 On Tue, 2009-06-02 at 04:13 -0400, Christopher Montgomery wrote:

 -#define IDLE_SWAPPER_TIMEOUT  250
 -
 +#define IDLE_SWAPPER_START     1000
 +#define IDLE_SWAPPER_INTERVAL  20
 +#define IDLE_SWAPPER_TILES_PER 10

 Should that constant perhaps better be called
 IDLE_SWAPPER_TILES_PER_RUN ?

Or PER_INTERVAL, sure.

Monty
___
Gimp-developer mailing list
Gimp-developer@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU
https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer