Hi,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (2005-06-01 at 1522.03 +0100):
This is intentional - google for reply to considered harmful.
This might have been of concern years ago, before people were used to
mailing lists which do set the Reply-to header. Nowadays, I'd say that the
opposite is true, since
On Wednesday 01 June 2005 11:47 am, GSR - FR wrote:
Hi,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (2005-06-01 at 1522.03 +0100):
This is intentional - google for reply to considered harmful.
This might have been of concern years ago, before people were used to
mailing lists which do set the Reply-to
