Re: [Gimp-developer] Déjà vu? (Re: Why be cryptic? 'Xtns' should be name 'Extensions')

[Campbell Barton]

Alexandre Prokoudine wrote:

On 3/27/06, Campbell Barton wrote:
  

Hello all
This debate about the Xtns etc. has been going on for tooo long..
Can there be a simple solution?

How about move (Xtns) to (File- Extensions)

The file menu isnt that full at the moment, and it seems a logical place
for it.



Huh? Logical? Why? :)

Alexandre
  


Hah. your right. its not exactly logical. but its a tradeoff
Toolbox File-Extensions (uses a word people can understand)
Toolbox Xtns  (Is in a place people see)

if you want to be picky- Preferences is not a file operation either.  
But there is no Edit, Options, Settings, Tools menu on the 
toolbox to place it.


--
Campbell J Barton

133 Hope Street
Geelong West, Victoria 3218 Australia

URL:http://www.metavr.com
e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
phone: AU (03) 5229 0241
___
Gimp-developer mailing list
Gimp-developer@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU
https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer

Re: [Gimp-developer] Déjà vu? (Re: Why be cryptic? 'Xtns' should be name 'Extensions')

[Sven Neumann]

Hi,

Alan Horkan [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

 Would doing a Firefox on the GIMP be a good move?  If mainline GIMP
 was slimmed down further would that be a good thing?  (Just in terms
 of disk usage GImpressionist, Gfig and Gflare add quite a bit of
 extra bulk.)  Maybe this would be more hassle than it is worth?

That is the plan for several years already. But we need a well working
plug-in distribution system before we can start to remove things from
the main package.


Sven
___
Gimp-developer mailing list
Gimp-developer@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU
https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer