Quoting Michael Schumacher :
> At the moment I'm not even sure if GIMP should be licensed under
> GPLv3 without a much better understanding of the license.
> For example, the fact that it is now impossible to use GPLv2-only
> libraries in plug-in wasn't considered at all. It's not such much
On Mon, Nov 22, 2010 at 8:04 AM, Michael Schumacher wrote:
>> Von: Christopher Curtis
>
>> *** (Sven, Mitch) ***
>>
>> This LICENSE text should probably be updated as 'Section 2' of GPLv3
>> doesn't talk about aggregations - it's been moved into section 5. It
>> might also be useful to address t
> Von: Christopher Curtis
> *** (Sven, Mitch) ***
>
> This LICENSE text should probably be updated as 'Section 2' of GPLv3
> doesn't talk about aggregations - it's been moved into section 5. It
> might also be useful to address this issue directly as the GPLv2 is
> generally well understood to
