To maximize chances of getting this into GIMP:
1. Create a regression test for the despecle plug-in that is run
with 'make check'. This is a great way to convince us that
your optimization in fact does not change the output, only
improves performance.
2. Create a patch, following
Hi,
As a part of my student project for Optimizing Open-Source Applications at
Warsaw University I have speed up despeckle plug-in for gimp.
Original version of the plugin run 56seconds for 1024x768 image with
despeckle radius 30 and adaptive flag turned off (on my Intel Macbook
2.1GHz). My
On 07/13/2010 10:28 AM, Przemysław Zych wrote:
Hi,
As a part of my student project for Optimizing Open-Source
Applications at Warsaw University I have speed up despeckle plug-in for
gimp.
Original version of the plugin run 56seconds for 1024x768 image with
despeckle radius 30 and adaptive
On Tue, 2010-07-13 at 10:49 +0200, Martin Nordholts wrote:
On 07/13/2010 10:28 AM, Przemysław Zych wrote:
Hi,
As a part of my student project for Optimizing Open-Source
Applications at Warsaw University I have speed up despeckle plug-in for
gimp.
Original version of the plugin run
On 07/13/10 19:52, Sven Neumann wrote:
On Tue, 2010-07-13 at 10:49 +0200, Martin Nordholts wrote:
On 07/13/2010 10:28 AM, Przemysław Zych wrote:
Hi,
As a part of my student project for Optimizing Open-Source
Applications at Warsaw University I have speed up despeckle plug-in for
gimp.
On Tue, 2010-07-13 at 22:19 +0200, g...@catking.net wrote:
I agree. I had to clean up some photos recently and ended up doing most
of it by hand.
If you code produces the same kind of results with that much of a speed
increase a patch would be worth providing. Kudos for achieving that
