On Thu, 15 Jul 2004, Shlomi Fish wrote:
> Another implementation of Scheme? Aren't the ones in:
>
> http://www.schemers.org/Documents/FAQ/#implementations
>
> enough? Or isn't any of them better suited as a starting point?
Yeah, really, Little Scheme (http://www.crockford.com/javascript/scheme.ht
On Thursday 15 July 2004 07:12 pm, Shlomi Fish wrote:
> Anyone can go and write another
> editor or bug tracker or window manager, if he'd like. That's one of the
> rights that Liberalism gives you. But if someone wishes to embark on
> something like that I'd advise him to contribute to an existin
On Thu, 15 Jul 2004, Markus Triska wrote:
> Date: Thu, 15 Jul 2004 18:52:36 +
> From: Markus Triska <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Scheme [was Re: [Gimp-developer] OSCon attendance]
>
> On Thursday 15 July 2004 02:25 pm, Shlomi Fish wrote:
On Thursday 15 July 2004 21:52, Markus Triska wrote:
> On Thursday 15 July 2004 02:25 pm, Shlomi Fish wrote:
> > Another implementation of Scheme? Aren't the ones in:
> >
> > http://www.schemers.org/Documents/FAQ/#implementations
> >
> > enough? Or isn't any of them better suited as a starting poin
On Thursday 15 July 2004 02:25 pm, Shlomi Fish wrote:
> Another implementation of Scheme? Aren't the ones in:
>
> http://www.schemers.org/Documents/FAQ/#implementations
>
> enough? Or isn't any of them better suited as a starting point?
Please ask Tom, not me, because he is doing it, or visit his
On Wednesday 14 July 2004 15:17, Markus Triska wrote:
> > 2. Its main developer (Tom Lord) is desperately in need of cash, as he is
> > currently unemployed. (or at least was the last time I checked).
>
> Visit http://gnuarch.org/ for more information. While he is de facto
> unemployed, as you say,
