Re: ANNOUNCE: GDynText 1.5.4

2001-02-09 Thread \spectrolite\
On 08 Feb 2001 10:53:34 +0100, Marco Lamberto wrote: On 8 Feb 2001, Sven Neumann wrote: If you think this release containes some important bugfixes with respect to the version we ship with gimp-1.2, please send us a patch, so we can integrate your changes into the 1-2 branch. Well there are

Addition to Align Visible Layers?

2001-02-09 Thread Tino Schwarze
Hi there, it would be pretty cool to have a simple checkbutton saying "active layer only". I took a quick look at the source, but I'm no GTK guru. :-( It should be simple though. Bye+Thanx, Tino. PS: Or am I missing a similar function somewhere else? (Toggling the active layer with SHIFT

Re: ANNOUNCE: GDynText 1.5.4

2001-02-09 Thread Marco Lamberto
On 9 Feb 2001, Tuomas "spectrolite" Kuosmanen wrote: Btw, does it now remember the font weight attribute? I have been using gimp-freetype lately, but I remember having to change the font bold every time I ran gdyntext on a dyntext layer. At least my CVS gimp has this bug still. Well, this is not

Fwd: Fwd: This Is What They Are Talking About

2001-02-09 Thread jessicasemaiI
NEW AND EXCITING!! WOMENS VIAGRA!! http://www.geocities.com/successwithus/

RFC: unified system of PaintObjects (long)

2001-02-09 Thread Jens Lautenbacher
Hi all, This mail comes from some discussions I had with Sven around the time just before 1.2.0, the recent discussion about textures and natural painting and a chat on IRC yesterday with Sven. He told me to write down what I said there and post it to the mailing list as a RFC --- I assume,

Re: RFC: unified system of PaintObjects (long)

2001-02-09 Thread \spectrolite\
On 09 Feb 2001 11:32:16 +0100, Jens Lautenbacher wrote: Hi all, This mail comes from some discussions I had with Sven around the time just before 1.2.0, the recent discussion about textures and natural painting and a chat on IRC yesterday with Sven. [ SNIP ] As David already pointed

Re: RFC: unified system of PaintObjects (long)

2001-02-09 Thread Jens Lautenbacher
Tuomas "\"spectrolite\"" Kuosmanen [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On 09 Feb 2001 11:32:16 +0100, Jens Lautenbacher wrote: Hi all, This mail comes from some discussions I had with Sven around the time just before 1.2.0, the recent discussion about textures and natural painting and a

Re: Possible bug in layer preview update

2001-02-09 Thread Michael Natterer
Dave Neary [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Hi all, I have reproduced this in the 1.3 branch - I think it may be in 1.2 as well but I haven't checked. Basically some of the preview update routines can crash on images with unusual ratios - I haven't entered a bug against this because I was

Re: [BUG] font ... not found on some images, works on others

2001-02-09 Thread Michael Natterer
Austin Donnelly [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On Thursday, 8 Feb 2001, Frank de Lange wrote: [fonts work on some images, but not others] Check both image's resolution: they're probably different. If you ask the text tool for text in a particular "point size", then it needs to scale it so

Re: RFC: unified system of PaintObjects (long)

2001-02-09 Thread Adrian Likins
On Fri, Feb 09, 2001 at 02:28:57PM +0100, Jens Lautenbacher wrote: Tuomas "\"spectrolite\"" Kuosmanen [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On 09 Feb 2001 11:32:16 +0100, Jens Lautenbacher wrote: Hi all, This mail comes from some discussions I had with Sven around the time just before

Re: RFC: unified system of PaintObjects (long)

2001-02-09 Thread David A. Bartold
On 9 Feb 2001, Jens Lautenbacher wrote: Here the question naturally arises: what kind of functions should be possible? Only transformations? Only some set of functions that are predefined in the core? Or could there be some possibility to handle user provided functions? How would these (if