For 1.2 maintenance, the CVS branch is gimp-1-2. To check it out:
cvs co -r gimp-1-2 gimp
What we'll do with HEAD has yet to be determined.
-Yosh
I am not supposed to download 10mb of source code, I have been patching up
since like 1.1.20, no way, you can provide a good patch from 1.1.32 to
1.2.0.
thanks tc
--
・‥…━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━…‥・
timecop at japan.co.jp |
On 26 Dec, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am not supposed to download 10mb of source code, I have been
patching up since like 1.1.20, no way, you can provide a good patch
from 1.1.32 to 1.2.0.
Why not use CVS and tags? Makes life much easier for both sides.
--
Servus,
Daniel
On Mon, 25 Dec 2000 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 26 Dec, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am not supposed to download 10mb of source code, I have been
patching up since like 1.1.20, no way, you can provide a good patch
from 1.1.32 to 1.2.0.
Why not use CVS and tags? Makes life much easier
On Tue, Dec 26, 2000 at 04:03:42AM +0900, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Why not use CVS and tags? Makes life much easier for both sides.
Because
a) my bandwidth is limited
You can use -z9 with cvs, which means the transfer size is not larger than
downloadign a normal diff.
Therefore,
On Mon, Dec 25, 2000 at 10:32:09PM +0100, Marc Lehmann wrote:
You can use -z9 with cvs, which means the transfer size is not larger than
downloadign a normal diff.
Doesn't CVS compress each file individually? The CVS protocol is quite
inefficient -- normally, I'd just do a CVS update on a shell