CVS branch

2000-12-25 Thread Manish Singh

For 1.2 maintenance, the CVS branch is gimp-1-2. To check it out:

cvs co -r gimp-1-2 gimp

What we'll do with HEAD has yet to be determined.

-Yosh



cmon guys, no patch from 1.1.32 to 1.2??

2000-12-25 Thread timecop
I am not supposed to download 10mb of source code, I have been patching up
since like 1.1.20, no way, you can provide a good patch from 1.1.32 to
1.2.0.

thanks tc


-- 
・‥…━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━…‥・
 timecop at japan.co.jp | OA通信サビース株式会社 | NTT DoCoMo
  I thought everything that Linus Torvalds is involved with was divine
  perfection? Must be a problem with NEC and Sony -about Crusoe recall
・‥…━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━…‥・


Re: cmon guys, no patch from 1.1.32 to 1.2??

2000-12-25 Thread egger

On 26 Dec, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 I am not supposed to download 10mb of source code, I have been
 patching up since like 1.1.20, no way, you can provide a good patch
 from 1.1.32 to 1.2.0.

 Why not use CVS and tags? Makes life much easier for both sides. 

-- 

Servus,
   Daniel




Re: cmon guys, no patch from 1.1.32 to 1.2??

2000-12-25 Thread timecop
On Mon, 25 Dec 2000 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 On 26 Dec, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
  I am not supposed to download 10mb of source code, I have been
  patching up since like 1.1.20, no way, you can provide a good patch
  from 1.1.32 to 1.2.0.
 
  Why not use CVS and tags? Makes life much easier for both sides. 


Because
a) my bandwidth is limited
b) most importantly, my time is limited.

Therefore, downloading a 200k patch is a lot easier than getting a
cvs-able gimp tree that I can update TODAY.

tc

-- 
・‥…━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━…‥・
 timecop at japan.co.jp | OA通信サビース株式会社 | NTT DoCoMo
  I thought everything that Linus Torvalds is involved with was divine
  perfection? Must be a problem with NEC and Sony -about Crusoe recall
・‥…━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━…‥・


Re: cmon guys, no patch from 1.1.32 to 1.2??

2000-12-25 Thread Marc Lehmann

On Tue, Dec 26, 2000 at 04:03:42AM +0900, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
   Why not use CVS and tags? Makes life much easier for both sides. 
 
 
 Because
 a) my bandwidth is limited

You can use -z9 with cvs, which means the transfer size is not larger than
downloadign a normal diff.
 Therefore, downloading a 200k patch is a lot easier than getting a
 cvs-able gimp tree that I can update TODAY.

Why not generate a patch using rdiff -u or something like that?

-- 
  -==- |
  ==-- _   |
  ---==---(_)__  __   __   Marc Lehmann  +--
  --==---/ / _ \/ // /\ \/ /   [EMAIL PROTECTED] |e|
  -=/_/_//_/\_,_/ /_/\_\   XX11-RIPE --+
The choice of a GNU generation   |
 |



Re: cmon guys, no patch from 1.1.32 to 1.2??

2000-12-25 Thread Steinar H. Gunderson

On Mon, Dec 25, 2000 at 10:32:09PM +0100, Marc Lehmann wrote:
You can use -z9 with cvs, which means the transfer size is not larger than
downloadign a normal diff.

Doesn't CVS compress each file individually? The CVS protocol is quite
inefficient -- normally, I'd just do a CVS update on a shell with good
bandwidth, and then either generate a diff, or just rsync the two trees.
rsync is your friend ;-)

/* Steinar */
-- 
Homepage: http://members.xoom.com/sneeze/