On Mon, Dec 25, 2000 at 10:32:09PM +0100, Marc Lehmann wrote:
>You can use -z9 with cvs, which means the transfer size is not larger than
>downloadign a normal diff.
Doesn't CVS compress each file individually? The CVS protocol is quite
inefficient -- normally, I'd just do a CVS update on a shell
On Tue, Dec 26, 2000 at 04:03:42AM +0900, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > Why not use CVS and tags? Makes life much easier for both sides.
>
>
> Because
> a) my bandwidth is limited
You can use -z9 with cvs, which means the transfer size is not larger than
downloadign a normal diff.
> Therefore,
On Mon, 25 Dec 2000 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On 26 Dec, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > I am not supposed to download 10mb of source code, I have been
> > patching up since like 1.1.20, no way, you can provide a good patch
> > from 1.1.32 to 1.2.0.
>
> Why not use CVS and tags? Makes life much
On 26 Dec, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I am not supposed to download 10mb of source code, I have been
> patching up since like 1.1.20, no way, you can provide a good patch
> from 1.1.32 to 1.2.0.
Why not use CVS and tags? Makes life much easier for both sides.
--
Servus,
Daniel
I am not supposed to download 10mb of source code, I have been patching up
since like 1.1.20, no way, you can provide a good patch from 1.1.32 to
1.2.0.
thanks tc
--
$B!&!E!D(,(,(,(,(,(,(,(,(,(,(,(,(,(,(,(,(,(,(,(,(,(,(,(,(,(,(,(,(,(,!D!E!&(B
timecop at japan.co.jp | $B#O#ADL?.%5%S!<%93
For 1.2 maintenance, the CVS branch is gimp-1-2. To check it out:
cvs co -r gimp-1-2 gimp
What we'll do with HEAD has yet to be determined.
-Yosh
