Re: gimp patch 1.1.32-1.2.0 [Also: Re: cmon guys, no patch from 1.1.32 to 1.2??]

2001-01-17 Thread Tom Rathborne
Hi folks On Wed, Jan 17, 2001 at 06:51:21PM -0500, Tom Rathborne wrote: > On Wed, Jan 17, 2001 at 06:45:18PM -0500, Christopher W. Curtis wrote: > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > On 9 Jan, Christopher Curtis wrote: > > > > I don't see a public rsync server for gimp, cvs or otherwise. > > > > Pe

Re: gimp patch 1.1.32-1.2.0 [Also: Re: cmon guys, no patch from 1.1.32 to 1.2??]

2001-01-17 Thread Tom Rathborne
Chris; On Wed, Jan 17, 2001 at 06:45:18PM -0500, Christopher W. Curtis wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > On 9 Jan, Christopher Curtis wrote: > > > I don't see a public rsync server for gimp, cvs or otherwise. > > > Perhaps this might be an acceptable option for people with > > > modest bandw

Re: gimp patch 1.1.32-1.2.0 [Also: Re: cmon guys, no patch from 1.1.32 to 1.2??]

2001-01-17 Thread Christopher W. Curtis
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > On 9 Jan, Christopher Curtis wrote: > > > I don't see a public rsync server for gimp, cvs or otherwise. Perhaps > > this might be an acceptable option for people with modest bandwidth > > capabilities. > > There are anonymous CVS servers for the GIMP. Yes, yes t

Re: gimp patch 1.1.32-1.2.0 [Also: Re: cmon guys, no patch from 1.1.32 to 1.2??]

2001-01-12 Thread Tomas Ogren
On 10 January, 2001 - Raphael Quinet sent me these 2.1K bytes: > Unfortunately, none of the three addresses mentioned for anoncvs > allowed me to get any files. One of them failed because of a server > configuration problem, another one could be reached but did not > respond, and the last one wa

Re: gimp patch 1.1.32-1.2.0 [Also: Re: cmon guys, no patch from 1.1.32 to 1.2??]

2001-01-10 Thread Garry R. Osgood
Raphael Quinet wrote: > Two days ago, I installed a new modem on my home PC because I thought > that after having spent several years working with semi-obsolete > released versions of the source code, I should get the bleeding edge > and use CVS from home (no firewall problems). So I tried to ge

Re: gimp patch 1.1.32-1.2.0 [Also: Re: cmon guys, no patch from 1.1.32 to 1.2??]

2001-01-10 Thread Raphael Quinet
On Wed, 10 Jan 2001, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > On 9 Jan, Christopher Curtis wrote: > They do; if we started now to switch over to deltas then quite a few > people would complain about that. I definitely see the point, I'm behind a > very narrow pipe as well so I prefer patches, too, but what

Re: gimp patch 1.1.32-1.2.0 [Also: Re: cmon guys, no patch from 1.1.32 to 1.2??]

2001-01-10 Thread egger
On 9 Jan, Christopher Curtis wrote: >> Patchsets also have a big problem which timecop already >> noticed: They don't contain binary files or patches to >> such and thus a patched tree might miss quite a few important >> files after a while. xdelta wouldn't cause that particular >> problem

Re: gimp patch 1.1.32-1.2.0 [Also: Re: cmon guys, no patch from 1.1.32 to 1.2??]

2001-01-09 Thread Christopher Curtis
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Patchsets also have a big problem which timecop already > noticed: They don't contain binary files or patches to > such and thus a patched tree might miss quite a few important > files after a while. xdelta wouldn't cause that particular > problem but is harder t

Re: gimp patch 1.1.32-1.2.0 [Also: Re: cmon guys, no patch from 1.1.32 to 1.2??]

2000-12-28 Thread egger
On 26 Dec, Garry R. Osgood wrote: > The tarballs and patch-sets are really meant for end-users > who prefer to compile from source, but don't otherwise > desire to get involved in maintenance and so don't have > a strong motivation to keep a bleeding-edge source tree > around. Patch sets are publ

Re: gimp patch 1.1.32-1.2.0 [Also: Re: cmon guys, no patch from 1.1.32 to 1.2??]

2000-12-26 Thread Garry R. Osgood
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I got off my lazy arse and made a patch. I have no idea > whether I did things correctly, I just downloaded the gimp- > 1.1.32.tar.bz2 and gimp-1.2.0.tar.bz2 files, unpacked them, > did diff -u -r gimp-1.1.32 gimp-1.2.0 >gimp-patch, then > bzip2'd that. > > It's 534kb,