Re: Wrong test for newer/older version of autoconf in the cvs

2000-06-25 Thread David Odin
On Sun, Jun 25, 2000 at 03:30:55PM +0200, David Odin wrote: > On Sun, Jun 25, 2000 at 02:26:57PM +0200, Steinar H. Gunderson wrote: > > On Sun, Jun 25, 2000 at 01:39:43AM +0200, David Odin wrote: > > >Testing autoconf... > > >expr: syntax error > > >too old! (Need 2.13, have 2.14 > > > [ ... ] >

Re: Wrong test for newer/older version of autoconf in the cvs

2000-06-25 Thread David Odin
On Sun, Jun 25, 2000 at 02:26:57PM +0200, Steinar H. Gunderson wrote: > On Sun, Jun 25, 2000 at 01:39:43AM +0200, David Odin wrote: > >Testing autoconf... > >expr: syntax error > >too old! (Need 2.13, have 2.14 > > [ ... ] > > Most likely, you have 2.14a or something like that. Yes I have 2.1

Re: Wrong test for newer/older version of autoconf in the cvs

2000-06-25 Thread Steinar H. Gunderson
On Sun, Jun 25, 2000 at 01:39:43AM +0200, David Odin wrote: >Testing autoconf... >expr: syntax error >too old! (Need 2.13, have 2.14 > [ ... ] Most likely, you have 2.14a or something like that. I sent a patch to Sven a few days ago that should fix this -- you may want to do a CVS update to see

Wrong test for newer/older version of autoconf in the cvs

2000-06-24 Thread David Odin
Hi, The latest cvs version of gimp include checks for recent versions of auto[conf|make]. It seems that these tests are wrong, at least on my box: $ ./autogen.sh I am testing that you have the required versions of autoconf, automake and gettext. This test is not foolproof, so if anything go