Re: [gimp-devel] New Plugins

2001-01-01 Thread Simon Budig

Tuomas Kuosmanen ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Speaking of old stuff to be ported to 1.2.. If I remember correctly, the 0.54
> version (yes, kids. It did exist and it ruled.) had antialiased Threshold
> tool.

Hmm - i just compiled gimp 0.54 and did not manage to find *any* threshold
function. Can you give me a rough idea, if this is a separate plugin
or how to invoke this function? A am considering to create a plugin
for this...

Bye,
Simon
-- 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]   http://www.home.unix-ag.org/simon/



Re: [gimp-devel] New Plugins

2000-12-30 Thread Tuomas Kuosmanen

On Fri, Dec 29, 2000 at 05:48:07PM +0100, thus said Simon Budig:
> Martin Weber ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > Now that we have the new gimp 1.2.0 out, we should think about adding
> > new plugins to the gimp. Here my proposal:

Speaking of old stuff to be ported to 1.2.. If I remember correctly, the 0.54
version (yes, kids. It did exist and it ruled.) had antialiased Threshold
tool. Now it might be a bit backwards as threshold probably shouldnt work
like that in the algorithmic sense. But it was _totally_ useful for making
masks and stuff (hi Carey :)

The current one is pretty limited as the edges will be very blocky and
rough.. I wonder what kind of algorighm the old version had? Would it be
possible to have a toggle for this? Is it very hard to port? Does anyone
have the 0.54 sources anyway?

Tuomas

BTW. I have PS6 and it is cool. Expect some ideas once I get some free time
and have had some time to play with it.

-- 

.--->  [EMAIL PROTECTED] .|\,/|  [EMAIL PROTECTED]  <-.
+>  www.helixcode.com  -  ()-@@  ,   tigert.gimp.org  <+
`->  art director   ,  `--')/   a gimp artist  <---'





Re: [gimp-devel] New Plugins

2000-12-29 Thread Marc Lehmann

On Fri, Dec 29, 2000 at 05:48:07PM +0100, Simon Budig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > warp-sharp.scm
> 
> Do you think it is useful to duplicate the same functionality, just because
> it is implemented in two different Languages?

maybe we should trade warp-sharp.pl in for the scheme original?

-- 
  -==- |
  ==-- _   |
  ---==---(_)__  __   __   Marc Lehmann  +--
  --==---/ / _ \/ // /\ \/ /   [EMAIL PROTECTED] |e|
  -=/_/_//_/\_,_/ /_/\_\   XX11-RIPE --+
The choice of a GNU generation   |
 |



Re: [gimp-devel] New Plugins

2000-12-29 Thread Simon Budig

Martin Weber ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Now that we have the new gimp 1.2.0 out, we should think about adding
> new plugins to the gimp. Here my proposal:

Basically the number of plugins distributed with the gimp will most probably
shrink. We are thinking about a new scheme of distributing plugins.
There is no final result of this discussion.

> 3. Not yet adopted to the new gimp, but stable in the old version:
> quant.c from gimp-unstable-plugins from the old 1.0.4. gimp.

quant used to crash sometimes deeply in the quantizing algorithm where
I have no idea of

> 4. Scripts:
> lcd-downscale.scm

Do you think, this script ios so importand it should be distributed with
the Gimp? It has a fairly experimental nature...

> warp-sharp.pl

Is in Gimp 1.2.

> warp-sharp.scm

Do you think it is useful to duplicate the same functionality, just because
it is implemented in two different Languages?

Bye,
Simon
-- 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]   http://www.home.unix-ag.org/simon/