Just my 2 cents:
As I stated earlier, I'm against declaring a freeze that totally stops
development and leaves the application in an inconsistent state. On the
other hand I think that only a few inconstistencies are left now. Those
can be figured out in a much shorter time then the release
Thus spoke Nick Lamb
> If no-one else will do it, I hearby offer to REVERT all features added to
> Gimp. It's quite obvious that some/ most of the people here will continue
> to rationalise additional features until well into the new millenium
> (and I don't mean 2000).
Hopefully this won't be ne
On Mon, 1 Nov 1999, Carey Bunks wrote:
> I think that Michael has a good point here. Why is it useful to
> declare a feature freeze? In my opinion the answer is so people can
> begin making plans with respect to the upcoming new stable release.
> If just anything is allowed aft
