On Wed, Oct 04, 2000 at 07:32:41PM +0200, Tino Schwarze
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > and remove the po form the list. Obvious bug, if you look at the right
> > place ;:(
> I get the same errors. :-(
This, again, could be caused what I said earlier, a missing (or
non-succeeded) make distclean.
On Sun, 1 Oct 2000, Dominic Knight <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, 29 Sep 2000, you [Marc Lehmann] wrote:
> > > > Could you send me the output of
> > >
> OK I managed to break make &>log by running a number of other processes
> at the same time.The output is below.
[...]
I confirm that th
On Fri, 29 Sep 2000, you wrote:
> > > Could you send me the output of
> >
OK I managed to break make &>log by running a number of other processes at the
same time.The output is below.
Regards,
Dominic.
make all-recursive
make[1]: Entering directory `/opt/gimp-1.1.26'
Making all in tools
make
> I am quite sure that this couldn't be the reason for gimp-perl working
> again, so either it was some cruft from earlier releases or the big is
> still hiding somewhere.
>
> the gimp configure.in checks for libz and disabled png automatically - you
> do not happen to have a configure output f
> the gimp configure.in checks for libz and disabled png automatically - you
> do not happen to have a configure output from the non-working version? ;)
>
> It shouldn't be required ;) Anyway, I forwarded your mail to
> gimp-developers, maybe someone spots the obvious thing.
>
I attached (hopefu
On Fri, Sep 29, 2000 at 09:54:50PM +0100, Dominic Knight <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> > Could you send me the output of
>
> I've had a good play around and fixed gimp-1.1.26 by installing zlib and zlib
> development (is it used for PNG compression ?), either this wasn't required
> previously