On Tue, 2015-03-17 at 20:45 +0100, Nazzareno Zallocco wrote:
> Hello, excuse my English
> I fell into this seller Ebay:
>
> http://www.ebay.it/usr/radiussoftware?_trksid=p2047675.l2559
>
> Hawking programs his company (CAD PRO Radius), but which are
> actually open
> source programs like your bl
On 03/17/2015 02:51 PM, Joseph Bupe wrote:
Ok Alex, the progress bar in the link below is what I am referring to. It
appears between every tweak on the Cage transform tool.
Link: http://s4.postimg.org/qqlkwjx4t/snapshort.png
I just feel it's too disruptive because I have to halt and wait for t
On 17 March 2015 at 20:29, Alexandre Prokoudine <
alexandre.prokoud...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 17, 2015 at 8:55 PM, Joseph Bupe wrote:
>
> > So, you mean to say tools like the n-point deformation have faster
> interim
> > transformations between every tweak even if they are not visible?
>
Hello, excuse my English
I fell into this seller Ebay:
http://www.ebay.it/usr/radiussoftware?_trksid=p2047675.l2559
Hawking programs his company (CAD PRO Radius), but which are actually open
source programs like your blender or Gimp.
And "what is normal or violates the law?
Thank You.
___
On Tue, Mar 17, 2015 at 8:55 PM, Joseph Bupe wrote:
> So, you mean to say tools like the n-point deformation have faster interim
> transformations between every tweak even if they are not visible?
Perhaps I'm using the wrong words :) No, that is not what I was
saying. The NPD tool isn't very fast
On 17 March 2015 at 19:10, Alexandre Prokoudine <
alexandre.prokoud...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 17, 2015 at 7:47 PM, Joseph Bupe wrote:
>
> > First, I do not understand which part of my suggestion will be making the
> > tool less interactive. All I am suggesting is to improve it so that it
On 17 March 2015 at 19:48, Alexandre Prokoudine <
alexandre.prokoud...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 17, 2015 at 8:27 PM, Joseph Bupe
> wrote:
>
> >
> >
> >> Note. however, that what you wrote is "The Cage transform tool should
> >> transform only once with an aggregate transformation". To me t
On Tue, Mar 17, 2015 at 8:27 PM, Joseph Bupe wrote:
>
>
>> Note. however, that what you wrote is "The Cage transform tool should
>> transform only once with an aggregate transformation". To me this
>> reads like "You do a lot of tweaking and you don't see the actual
>> change untill you explicite
On 17 March 2015 at 18:13, Alexandre Prokoudine <
alexandre.prokoud...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 17, 2015 at 9:47 AM, Joseph Bupe wrote:
> > The Cage transform tool should transform only once with an aggregate
> > transformation. It would make the workflow a breeze than in it's current
> > f
On Tue, Mar 17, 2015 at 7:47 PM, Joseph Bupe wrote:
> First, I do not understand which part of my suggestion will be making the
> tool less interactive. All I am suggesting is to improve it so that it works
> as good as in the bounded beharmonic weights demo here:
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v
On Tue, Mar 17, 2015 at 9:47 AM, Joseph Bupe wrote:
> The Cage transform tool should transform only once with an aggregate
> transformation. It would make the workflow a breeze than in it's current
> form.
Joseph, you are basically suggesting to make the tool less interactive
to make it more respo
The Cage transform tool should transform only once with an aggregate
transformation. It would make the workflow a breeze than in it's current
form.
Also, the Cage transform tool's deformation applied at one point has a
spill-over of its influences through the entire image pixels. The nearest
point
12 matches
Mail list logo
