Hi,
On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 8:24 PM, jEsuSdA 8) wrote:
> El 27/11/13 07:04, Jehan Pagès escribió:
>>
>> Also am I right to assume that we want to have*all* icons in this
>>
>> style, and get rid of all the generic GTK+ icons too?
>
>
> I like it!
> When using a desktop icon theme like Faenza, Gi
El 27/11/13 07:04, Jehan Pagès escribió:
Also am I right to assume that we want to have*all* icons in this
style, and get rid of all the generic GTK+ icons too?
I like it!
When using a desktop icon theme like Faenza, Gimp looks like great, but
if you use another more colorful icon theme, it l
Hi,
On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 2:27 AM, jEsuSdA 8) wrote:
> El 25/11/13 07:05, Jehan Pagès escribió:
>> Also it looks like it comprises only the icons for the light
>> background theme, doesn't it?
>
>
>
> Here the light one:
>
> http://www.jesusda.com/files/symbolic-gimp_light.7z
Thanks jEsuSdA!
El 25/11/13 07:05, Jehan Pagès escribió:
Hi jEsuSdA,
Hi Jehan,
Today I've wanted to actually check the theme and see how it is, other
than as a screenshot. Your archive found in
http://www.jesusda.com/files/symbolic-gimp.7z is the last version?
Yes, is the latest one.
Also it looks lik
Hi jEsuSdA,
On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 5:08 AM, jEsuSdA 8) wrote:
> El 05/11/13 16:59, scl escribió:
>
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Jakub Steiner answered me.
>> He and Barbara Muraus (the other icon designer who
>> created the ArtLibre icon set) are ok with relicensing
>> it under the GPLv3. We agreed to mention
Hi,
On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 4:59 AM, scl wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Jakub Steiner answered me.
> He and Barbara Muraus (the other icon designer who
> created the ArtLibre icon set) are ok with relicensing
> it under the GPLv3. We agreed to mention their names
> in the sources.
>
> Jehan, if you have plann
El 05/11/13 16:59, scl escribió:
Hi,
Jakub Steiner answered me.
He and Barbara Muraus (the other icon designer who
created the ArtLibre icon set) are ok with relicensing
it under the GPLv3. We agreed to mention their names
in the sources.
Jehan, if you have planned to work on this, please
let
Hi,
Jakub Steiner answered me.
He and Barbara Muraus (the other icon designer who
created the ArtLibre icon set) are ok with relicensing
it under the GPLv3. We agreed to mention their names
in the sources.
Jehan, if you have planned to work on this, please
let me know to save us from duplicatio
On 3.11.2013 at 12:51 PM Jehan Pagès wrote:> Hello Jimmac,
my name is Jehan. I am a GIMP developer. We are considering releasing
the next major release of GIMP with an additional icon set, which goes
well with a darker theme. A contributor (jEsuSdA, in Cc) added the
missing icons and also made
Hello Jimmac,
my name is Jehan. I am a GIMP developer. We are considering releasing
the next major release of GIMP with an additional icon set, which goes
well with a darker theme. A contributor (jEsuSdA, in Cc) added the
missing icons and also made an alternate version which would go with a
light
Hi,
On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 11:31 AM, Michael Schumacher wrote:
> On 28.10.2013 19:59, scl wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> in matter of the unclear license situation I asked the FSF
>> for clarification and like to share their answer (see below).
>> It's not a legal advice, but I hope it sheds us some light
Hi,
On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 11:26 AM, Michael Schumacher wrote:
> On 30.10.2013 23:14, Jehan Pagès wrote:
>
>> So well now I'm not sure anymore. Though checking the said file, I
>> would not say they are "compiled" in, merely listed as filenames
>> (which could therefore apply to any other set of
On 28.10.2013 19:59, scl wrote:
> Hi,
>
> in matter of the unclear license situation I asked the FSF
> for clarification and like to share their answer (see below).
> It's not a legal advice, but I hope it sheds us some light
> on the issue.
Unfortunately your mail seems to discard the fact that
On 30.10.2013 23:14, Jehan Pagès wrote:
> So well now I'm not sure anymore. Though checking the said file, I
> would not say they are "compiled" in, merely listed as filenames
> (which could therefore apply to any other set of icons with the same
> names). Only stock-question-64.png seems kind of
Hi,
On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 5:01 AM, jEsuSdA 8) wrote:
> El 29/10/13 01:57, Jehan Pagès escribió:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 8:15 AM, jEsuSdA 8) wrote:
>>>
>>> El 28/10/13 18:37, Alexandre Prokoudine escribió:
Is your theme from October 4 the latest version?
>>>
>>>
>>
El 29/10/13 01:57, Jehan Pagès escribió:
Hi,
On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 8:15 AM, jEsuSdA 8) wrote:
El 28/10/13 18:37, Alexandre Prokoudine escribió:
Is your theme from October 4 the latest version?
Here is the latest version:
http://www.jesusda.com/files/symbolic-gimp.7z
Reading Sven emai
Hi,
On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 8:15 AM, jEsuSdA 8) wrote:
> El 28/10/13 18:37, Alexandre Prokoudine escribió:
>>
>> Is your theme from October 4 the latest version?
>
> Here is the latest version:
>
> http://www.jesusda.com/files/symbolic-gimp.7z
>
Reading Sven email about a possible licensing issu
El 28/10/13 18:37, Alexandre Prokoudine escribió:
On Tue, Oct 8, 2013 at 12:20 PM, jEsuSdA 8) wrote:
The buttons can be identified easily and his name appears clearly, but the
icon in the tabs does not appears. I've searching on other values and trying
several things, but I can found the icon n
Hi,
in matter of the unclear license situation I asked the FSF
for clarification and like to share their answer (see below).
It's not a legal advice, but I hope it sheds us some light
on the issue.
Best,
Sven
On 11.10.2013 at 02:48 A.M., Yoni Rabkin via RT wrote:
> I'm writing as a contributo
On Tue, Oct 8, 2013 at 12:20 PM, jEsuSdA 8) wrote:
> The buttons can be identified easily and his name appears clearly, but the
> icon in the tabs does not appears. I've searching on other values and trying
> several things, but I can found the icon name and any way to identify it.
Hi,
Is your t
El 07/10/13 23:21, GSR - FR escribió:
Hi,
lis...@jesusda.com (2013-10-04 at 1244.03 +0200):
[...]
I've been read the gimp documentation ( libgimpwidgets-GimpStock.htm
) to edit the imagerc file and load all the icons, but some ones
does not load and I can not find the correct '' stock["NAME"]
Hi,
lis...@jesusda.com (2013-10-04 at 1244.03 +0200):
[...]
> I've been read the gimp documentation ( libgimpwidgets-GimpStock.htm
> ) to edit the imagerc file and load all the icons, but some ones
> does not load and I can not find the correct '' stock["NAME"] = ''
> entry.
When I assembled G3H
El 07/10/13 11:44, Simon Budig escribió:
jEsuSdA 8) (lis...@jesusda.com) wrote:
I have found a file: gimpstock.h that contains this lines:
/* missing icons: */
#define GIMP_STOCK_PALETTE GTK_STOCK_SELECT_COLOR
I suppose this mean that there is no icon defined, so Gimp load a
jEsuSdA 8) (lis...@jesusda.com) wrote:
> I have found a file: gimpstock.h that contains this lines:
>
> /* missing icons: */
> #define GIMP_STOCK_PALETTE GTK_STOCK_SELECT_COLOR
>
> I suppose this mean that there is no icon defined, so Gimp load a
> gtk one and it is impossible
El 06/10/13 12:12, jEsuSdA 8) escribió:
El 05/10/13 23:49, Simon Budig escribió:
jEsuSdA 8) (lis...@jesusda.com) wrote:
El 05/10/13 01:05, Simon Budig escribió:
jEsuSdA 8) (lis...@jesusda.com) wrote:
But solving A does not solve B and the old coloured icon still
appears. ¿?¿?¿? :(
ok, weird
On 06.10.2013 15:40, Jehan Pagès wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sun, Oct 6, 2013 at 9:08 PM, Sven Claussner wrote:
>> Another thing we should consider is the license. The used symbolic
>> icon set is licensed under the Creative Commons Share Alike License 3
>> (CCBYSA3). It is probably [incompatible with th
Hi,
On Sun, Oct 6, 2013 at 9:08 PM, Sven Claussner wrote:
> Another thing we should consider is the license. The used symbolic
> icon set is licensed under the Creative Commons Share Alike License 3
> (CCBYSA3). It is probably [incompatible with the GPL] used in GIMP
> and could also be incompati
jEsuSdA 8) (lis...@jesusda.com) wrote:
> Not for me! :(
> What kind of magic is this?! hehehe.
Sorry, my fault. I was looking at the wrong icon.
I see the problem now as well. Not sure what is happening there...
Bye,
Simon
--
si...@budig.de http://simon.budig
El 06/10/13 10:08, Sven Claussner escribió:
Hi all,
Hi!
I'm also for an additional dark theme. Both (dark and lighter theme)
can ease the artists work and be used to check the images appearance
on-the-fly.
I've already sat for hours on searching for a suitable dark theme,
integrating the G
El 05/10/13 23:49, Simon Budig escribió:
jEsuSdA 8) (lis...@jesusda.com) wrote:
El 05/10/13 01:05, Simon Budig escribió:
jEsuSdA 8) (lis...@jesusda.com) wrote:
But solving A does not solve B and the old coloured icon still
appears. ¿?¿?¿? :(
ok, weird.
yes. :(
Dunno, I added the followi
Hi all,
I'm also for an additional dark theme. Both (dark and lighter theme)
can ease the artists work and be used to check the images appearance
on-the-fly.
I've already sat for hours on searching for a suitable dark theme,
integrating the Gnome art-libre icon set and after asking Jimmac at IRC
Hi,
On Sun, Oct 6, 2013 at 3:11 PM, Jehan Pagès wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sat, Oct 5, 2013 at 12:59 AM, Simon Budig wrote:
>> jEsuSdA 8) (lis...@jesusda.com) wrote:
>>> Working on gtkrc I have solved F bug and improve the icons visualization.
>>
>> Thanks for your efforts, that indeed looks really gre
Hi,
On Sat, Oct 5, 2013 at 12:59 AM, Simon Budig wrote:
> jEsuSdA 8) (lis...@jesusda.com) wrote:
>> Working on gtkrc I have solved F bug and improve the icons visualization.
>
> Thanks for your efforts, that indeed looks really great. I'm all for
> including it in the main gimp source.
I'm ok fo
jEsuSdA 8) (lis...@jesusda.com) wrote:
> El 05/10/13 01:05, Simon Budig escribió:
> >jEsuSdA 8) (lis...@jesusda.com) wrote:
> >>But solving A does not solve B and the old coloured icon still
> >>appears. ¿?¿?¿? :(
> >
> >ok, weird.
>
>
> yes. :(
Dunno, I added the following section to the imager
El 05/10/13 01:05, Simon Budig escribió:
jEsuSdA 8) (lis...@jesusda.com) wrote:
But solving A does not solve B and the old coloured icon still
appears. ¿?¿?¿? :(
ok, weird.
yes. :(
I have include the gtk-print to force CMYK color chooser to load the
symbolic icon instead the gtk one. ;)
jEsuSdA 8) (lis...@jesusda.com) wrote:
> >>B - Same of A. I think solving A maybe can solve this bug.
> >
> >Yeah.
>
> But solving A does not solve B and the old coloured icon still
> appears. ¿?¿?¿? :(
ok, weird.
> I have include the gtk-print to force CMYK color chooser to load the
> symbolic
El 04/10/13 14:37, Simon Budig escribió:
jEsuSdA 8) (lis...@jesusda.com) wrote:
A - I have the symbolic icon, but I can find the widget name to load
the icon. Gimp allways loads this colorful icon and I can not change
it. ¿What name has it?
This is imported from the default gtk stock icons: "g
jEsuSdA 8) (lis...@jesusda.com) wrote:
> A - I have the symbolic icon, but I can find the widget name to load
> the icon. Gimp allways loads this colorful icon and I can not change
> it. ¿What name has it?
This is imported from the default gtk stock icons: "gtk-select-color"
> B - Same of A. I th
El 04/10/13 13:59, Simon Budig escribió:
The bug D is almost done: eye icon has changed, bug when clicked,
>there are no "closed eye" showd, so, I need help to solve this.
I am not sure if I understand the bug: the default theme does not
contain a "closed eye" icon.
Do you see the default eye w
jEsuSdA 8) (lis...@jesusda.com) wrote:
> Working on gtkrc I have solved F bug and improve the icons visualization.
Thanks for your efforts, that indeed looks really great. I'm all for
including it in the main gimp source.
> The bug D is almost done: eye icon has changed, bug when clicked,
> there
Here you can find the bugs :
http://www.pasteall.org/pic/show.php?id=60270
A - I have the symbolic icon, but I can find the widget name to load the
icon. Gimp allways loads this colorful icon and I can not change it.
¿What name has it?
There are no reference in libgimpwidgets documentation abo
Hi!
Few days ago, I saw the Alexandre Prokoudine post on Google+ about Gimp
and Symbolic icon theme:
https://plus.google.com/104550365344856778857/posts/LP1pWr7YEgA
He said he downloaded the gimp source code and overwrite the main icons,
then he compiled.
This procedure is not very easy to
42 matches
Mail list logo
