Re: [Gimp-developer] suggestions

2016-04-06 Thread Elle Stone
On 04/06/2016 12:30 AM, Sven Claussner wrote: Hi Elle, Hi Sven, On 5.4.2016 at 10:55 PM Elle Stone wrote: I started a branch of this current thread to ask some specific questions regarding a couple of babl functions that might be useful for conveying RGB color space information from GIMP

Re: [Gimp-developer] suggestions

2016-04-06 Thread Elle Stone
On 04/04/2016 05:36 PM, C R wrote: Only so many hours in the day. For RAW processing Darktable works fine. Back when I switched from Photoshop, RAW editing was still done via plugin, and if you were serious about it, you'd do it in Adobe Lightroom. Back when I switched from PhotoShop, I had

Re: [Gimp-developer] suggestions

2016-04-05 Thread Sven Claussner
Hi Elle, On 5.4.2016 at 10:55 PM Elle Stone wrote: On 04/05/2016 02:10 PM, Sven Claussner wrote: Hi, On 4.4.2016 at 3:56 PM Elle Stone wrote: On 03/27/2016 02:44 PM, C R wrote: * The ability to edit in RGB working color spaces other than sRGB. I'm for this, too. sRGB is from the 1990's

Re: [Gimp-developer] suggestions

2016-04-05 Thread Elle Stone
On 04/05/2016 02:10 PM, Sven Claussner wrote: Hi, On 4.4.2016 at 3:56 PM Elle Stone wrote: On 03/27/2016 02:44 PM, C R wrote: * The ability to edit in RGB working color spaces other than sRGB. I'm for this, too. sRGB is from the 1990's and made for the web. Life goes on. Modern monitors aim

Re: [Gimp-developer] suggestions

2016-04-05 Thread Sven Claussner
Hi, On 4.4.2016 at 3:56 PM Elle Stone wrote: On 03/27/2016 02:44 PM, C R wrote: * The ability to edit in RGB working color spaces other than sRGB. I'm for this, too. sRGB is from the 1990's and made for the web. Life goes on. Modern monitors aim to get as much AdobeRGB coverage as possible

Re: [Gimp-developer] suggestions

2016-04-05 Thread Alexandre Prokoudine
5 апр. 2016 г. 18:57 пользователь "Elle Stone" написал: > I do appreciate that editing in color spaces other than sRGB is now on the official Roadmap. However, it's on the Roadmap for "Future GIMP". Anything in that section can be moved to e.g. 3.2 provided there is a developer working on any of

Re: [Gimp-developer] suggestions

2016-04-05 Thread Elle Stone
On 04/05/2016 11:59 AM, Elle Stone wrote: timeline for past GIMP releases: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GIMP_version_history ___ gimp-developer-list mailing list List address:gimp-developer-list@gnome.org List membership:

Re: [Gimp-developer] suggestions

2016-04-05 Thread Elle Stone
On 04/05/2016 04:07 AM, Alexandre Prokoudine wrote: 4 апр. 2016 г. 20:10 пользователь "Elle Stone" написал: But what about the ability to edit in color spaces other than sRGB? Is this less or more of a priority than nondestructive editing? We've had this conversation before. This is how

Re: [Gimp-developer] suggestions

2016-04-05 Thread Alexandre Prokoudine
4 апр. 2016 г. 20:10 пользователь "Elle Stone" написал: > But what about the ability to edit in color spaces other than sRGB? Is this less or more of a priority than nondestructive editing? We've had this conversation before. This is how http://wiki.gimp.org/wiki/Roadmap got adjusted to

Re: [Gimp-developer] suggestions

2016-04-04 Thread C R
> > I'm sure if they require something other than sRGB, they will want >> Photoshop (at the moment). >> Of course, that is a self-imposed limitation. Suggesting that >> professional results can only be gotten outside sRGB is untrue. >> > > "Professional results" and "self-imposed limitation" are

Re: [Gimp-developer] suggestions

2016-04-04 Thread Elle Stone
On 04/04/2016 01:54 PM, C R wrote: On Mon, Apr 4, 2016 at 2:56 PM, Elle Stone > wrote: Putting the serious limitations of 8-bit editing to one side, even high bit depth GIMP 2.9/2.10 lacks critically important

Re: [Gimp-developer] suggestions

2016-04-04 Thread Andrew Pullins
I will say that it would be nice to have a recommended hardware to run GIMP. I know this is Free and Open Source Software and you can pretty much run it one anything as well as we are not Photoshop and are not worried about sails and making sure that the customer is running the best hardware to

Re: [Gimp-developer] suggestions

2016-04-04 Thread Elle Stone
On 04/04/2016 12:28 PM, Øyvind Kolås wrote: One of the primary reason some of us have has as motivation for working on GEGL and its integration in GIMP for more than a decade is not high bit depth support, but non-destructive editing features like "adjustment layers" and "smart objects". As has

Re: [Gimp-developer] suggestions

2016-04-04 Thread Øyvind Kolås
On Mon, Apr 4, 2016 at 4:19 PM, Partha Bagchi wrote: > Also, I would think that nondestructive > editing would be high on the list (Photoshop's "Smart Objects"). > > If I am not mistaken, Alex has already mentioned adjustment layers numerous > times in past as a

Re: [Gimp-developer] suggestions

2016-04-04 Thread Partha Bagchi
Totally agree with you. Color management would definitely be a priority for high-end photo editing software. Also, I would think that nondestructive editing would be high on the list (Photoshop's "Smart Objects"). If I am not mistaken, Alex has already mentioned adjustment layers numerous times

Re: [Gimp-developer] suggestions

2016-04-04 Thread Elle Stone
On 03/27/2016 02:44 PM, C R wrote: I've found that anything else would be a waste of (everyone's) time. For some, nothing but Photoshop will work for their graphics needs. It's no use arguing with them, because they have already made up their mind, and it's more important to think they are

Re: [Gimp-developer] suggestions

2016-03-27 Thread C R
> > It would also be nice if people could see good reasons not to comment, > > as one user has posted online (I think at answers.yahoo.com), that GIMP > > is "not as good as Photoshop". > > What do you expect us to do about it? > > Alex > On answers.yahoo.com, it seems to me that anyone from the

Re: [Gimp-developer] suggestions

2016-03-27 Thread Alexandre Prokoudine
On Sun, Mar 27, 2016 at 8:22 PM, mailreader wrote: > It would also be nice if people could see good reasons not to comment, > as one user has posted online (I think at answers.yahoo.com), that GIMP > is "not as good as Photoshop". What do you expect us to do about it? Alex

Re: [Gimp-developer] suggestions

2016-03-27 Thread C R
I recommend this small change to the current download page: www.opendesignstudio.org/gimp/samples/gimp_download_file_size.png On Sun, Mar 27, 2016 at 7:44 PM, C R wrote: > Actually, I'm on Linux, and I don't see the file size listed either. > I don't personally care much,

Re: [Gimp-developer] suggestions

2016-03-27 Thread C R
Actually, I'm on Linux, and I don't see the file size listed either. I don't personally care much, because I know that GIMP is damn small compared to most high-powered graphics applications, but still I can see that some folks may care the first time they download from the website. If anything,

Re: [Gimp-developer] suggestions

2016-03-27 Thread Paka
* mailrea...@juno.com [03-27-16 13:30]: > It would be nice if the website said how much free space is required to > download the program and to run it, and what other things might be > useful to use with it and where they can be found and how big they are. They are but you

[Gimp-developer] suggestions

2016-03-27 Thread mailrea...@juno.com
It would be nice if the website said how much free space is required to download the program and to run it, and what other things might be useful to use with it and where they can be found and how big they are. It would also be nice if people could see good reasons not to comment, as one user

[Gimp-developer] suggestions

2012-06-24 Thread wanderer
Hello! I'm new here, so first of all I would like to say it's a wonderful job that has been done in 2.8. Knowing a little bit of programming, I thought I might help with minor improvements to the software. So, I came up with these little improvements to Gimp that would make it better, in my