Re: [Gimp-developer] Brush size relative to canvas size

2014-10-20 Thread Joao S. O. Bueno
It is obvious that the current way of changing brush size is nearly unusable. I have doubts however if your proposal would be the best way to have a better UI, or if it is just a work around for the current behavior. Above all, just because Richard steped up with a proposed UI behavior for th e

Re: [Gimp-developer] GSoC

2015-02-11 Thread Joao S. O. Bueno
Hi there - As I've replied online to Alex - i am willing to mentor this year - and we are still looking for more people to step up. js -- On 6 February 2015 at 13:19, Alexandre Prokoudine alexandre.prokoud...@gmail.com wrote: Hello, Google Summer of Code 2015 is launching next week. I

Re: [Gimp-developer] Need help with Python plugin exporting to raw file (using Gimp 2.9)

2015-02-20 Thread Joao S. O. Bueno
Hi Alek_ it turns out that the Python bindings for GIMP had not been updated to deal with higher precision images as of yet. Don't despair - since you had built GIMP master, this is as good time as any to get it going. :-) You can get to know the image precision (and even set it) thorugh the

Re: [Gimp-developer] [Gimp-user] Translation of Gimp

2015-01-13 Thread Joao S. O. Bueno
Alexandre: Maybe he is referring to Portugal's portuguese https://l10n.gnome.org/languages/pt/gnome-gimp/ui/ Or, more likely, to the development version - which is actually how I started years ago. Pedro - Hi - I use to be the maintainer of the Brazilian Portuguese translation for GIMP. I

Re: [Gimp-developer] Drop shadow - a question from an user - developer-version 2.9

2015-02-09 Thread Joao S. O. Bueno
On 9 February 2015 at 09:15, Alexandre Prokoudine alexandre.prokoud...@gmail.com wrote: On Mon, Feb 9, 2015 at 2:10 PM, Joao S. O. Bueno wrote: In this particular case, I am in favor of restoring the extra-layer creation behavior, or at least have a checkbox to imply it. The uses I myself

Re: [Gimp-developer] Drop shadow - a question from an user - developer-version 2.9

2015-02-09 Thread Joao S. O. Bueno
Although the filter is intended to work that way, I consider it to be a bug. As you know, GIMP 2.9 is still under heavy development, an done of the pending things is to find-put a way to have the classic plug-ins installed back again on a running GIMP - that way, any regressions such as this

Re: [Gimp-developer] Cage Transform Tool's transformations

2015-03-18 Thread Joao S. O. Bueno
On 17 March 2015 at 18:20, Elle Stone ellest...@ninedegreesbelow.com wrote: On 03/17/2015 02:51 PM, Joseph Bupe wrote: Ok Alex, the progress bar in the link below is what I am referring to. It appears between every tweak on the Cage transform tool. Link:

Re: [Gimp-developer] Selections to shapes

2015-03-20 Thread Joao S. O. Bueno
Try using Select-To Path -- Everything you describe is already possible. Although, maybe, selection-To path could have more usability if it would change to the Path Tool, with the new path as active, so that its nodes are displayed at once. Currently, one has to manually go to the Paths dockable,

Re: [Gimp-developer] Huge performance improvement idea

2015-03-20 Thread Joao S. O. Bueno
On 20 March 2015 at 13:43, Chandana Bandara cbsoftw...@gmail.com wrote: Greetings from Chandana, Hi Chandana - welcome to this group. Thank you for your suggestions. In fact the workflow you suggest could be made explicitly possible in the future as we move GIMP to a non-destructive editing

Re: [Gimp-developer] Useability enhancement request: unified/expanded file export dialog

2015-03-11 Thread Joao S. O. Bueno
On 11 March 2015 at 18:05, Ofnuts ofn...@gmx.com wrote: On 11/03/15 14:26, Elle Stone wrote: 3. Scaling upon export: When exporting an image for display on the web, the image usually needs to be resized, and sometimes you might want to make some additional edits at the reduced size before

Re: [Gimp-developer] why I can't repeat this command?

2015-03-23 Thread Joao S. O. Bueno
Hi Marco - What I like to do in cases like this is to enable preferences-inbterface-Dynamic Keyboard shortcuts , (actually I keep this always on), and assign a temporary shortcut to the action at hand (in this case, shrink selection). ot having the overhead of going through the keyboard

Re: [Gimp-developer] Need help with Python plugin exporting to raw file (using Gimp 2.9)

2015-02-20 Thread Joao S. O. Bueno
way), make drawable.get_buffer directly available and returning a Gegl buffer wrapped in a convenient Python object. On 21 February 2015 at 00:49, Joao S. O. Bueno gwid...@gmail.com wrote: Getting there... no need to poke me for now - GIMP 2.9.1 Python Console Python 2.7.5 (default, Nov 3 2014

Re: [Gimp-developer] Need help with Python plugin exporting to raw file (using Gimp 2.9)

2015-02-20 Thread Joao S. O. Bueno
, 0.0003035269910469651, 0.6235294342041016, 0.0003035269910469651, 0.0003035269910469651, 0.0003035269910469651, 0.6235294342041016, 0.0003035269910469651,...] On 20 February 2015 at 09:50, Joao S. O. Bueno gwid...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Alek_ it turns out that the Python bindings for GIMP had

Re: [Gimp-developer] Need help with Python plugin exporting to raw file (using Gimp 2.9)

2015-02-21 Thread Joao S. O. Bueno
20, 2015 at 11:54 PM, Joao S. O. Bueno gwid...@gmail.com wrote: Hi - I've actually comitted the above method - but beware it is subject to some changes. I've added the precision read-only property to gimp-images, and the get_data method to drawables (layers and channels) - get_data returns

Re: [Gimp-developer] Need help with Python plugin exporting to raw file (using Gimp 2.9)

2015-02-21 Thread Joao S. O. Bueno
directly available and returning a Gegl buffer wrapped in a convenient Python object. On 21 February 2015 at 00:49, Joao S. O. Bueno gwid...@gmail.com wrote: Getting there... no need to poke me for now - GIMP 2.9.1 Python Console Python 2.7.5 (default, Nov 3 2014, 14:26:24) [GCC 4.8.3

Re: [Gimp-developer] GIMP useability - choosing linear vs perceptually uniform RGB

2015-04-29 Thread Joao S. O. Bueno
Hi Elle - Seeing your e-mail give the same kind of and what can I do about it feeling I have when talking to Americo (he should also be reading this mailing list by now). There are obvious lots of improvements that _could_ be done so that GIMP would be a killer application. What you do on the

Re: [Gimp-developer] GIMP at Libre Graphics Meeting 2015 - Toronto, Canada, April 29 to May 2

2015-04-28 Thread Joao S. O. Bueno
Any tentative time set for the GIMP B.o.F. already? So that those of us who could not make it this year can follow on irc. On 28 April 2015 at 03:08, Michael Schumacher schum...@gmx.de wrote: Hi all, as in most years, some of us are at the Libre Graphics Meeting. If you are in the area

Re: [Gimp-developer] Gimp in private schools and educational institutions

2015-04-15 Thread Joao S. O. Bueno
On 15 April 2015 at 05:40, Simon Budig si...@budig.de wrote: Gez (lis...@ohweb.com.ar) wrote: [...] optional patch that provides and easy way to remove the name GIMP from the UI, replacing it for a different one? Now, seriously. What do devs think about this idea? If somebody provided a

Re: [Gimp-developer] rollApp GIMP usage

2015-05-27 Thread Joao S. O. Bueno
On 27 May 2015 at 09:00, Boudewijn Rempt b...@valdyas.org wrote: Only if they'd distribute gimp, which they, arguably aren't doing. EEek! Time to go AGPL 3.0 :-) ___ gimp-developer-list mailing list List address:gimp-developer-list@gnome.org

Re: [Gimp-developer] Sourceforge downloads

2015-05-27 Thread Joao S. O. Bueno
On 27 May 2015 at 09:49, Jehan Pagès jehan.marmott...@gmail.com wrote: It also appears that the account the project page belongs to is sf-editor1, and a lot of well known projects are listed on the user page: http://sourceforge.net/u/sf-editor1/ As I openned the profile for that page to check

Re: [Gimp-developer] Sourceforge downloads

2015-05-26 Thread Joao S. O. Bueno
On 26 May 2015 at 12:08, Jernej Simončič jer...@ena.si wrote: On Tuesday, May 26, 2015, 8:40:08, Ofnuts wrote: Should this site be closed down entirely (assuming it is still under the control of someone related to Gimp development)? There are still plenty of links pointing to it, and it would

Re: [Gimp-developer] Fade length setting for paint dynamics

2015-10-06 Thread Joao S. O. Bueno
Sttting it programatically is likely a missing feature - it shouldbe available as gimp-context-fade-set-length -- and yes, it has nothing to do with percents On 2 October 2015 at 09:51, Ofnuts wrote: > I see that some changes have occured in that area in 2.8.14... However: > >

Re: [Gimp-developer] Future of Python v2 scripts

2015-11-25 Thread Joao S. O. Bueno
Therte is aproblem in migrating - because converting scripts to Python3 nto that much of a hasle, but current PyGIMP uses PyGTK - and _that_ is a problem - because we should them move the Python itnerface to gobject introspection - and it would imply to move the GIMP parts to use gobjetc

Re: [Gimp-developer] Future of Python v2 scripts

2015-11-26 Thread Joao S. O. Bueno
While it is is feasible to have Python3 as the system default install, it is not practical to remove Python2 from the system. Even if it is not installed by default (which I doubt very much) it will be reachable via the default packaging system (and therefore available as a GIMP dependency).

[Gimp-developer] State of Libre Graphics Union 2016 - call for Slides

2016-03-20 Thread Joao S. O. Bueno
Dear Folks at GIMP - The first presentation event in this years LGM program is ‘state of Libre Graphics’. A common update for many of the projects across our Libre Graphics community. This frees up room in the schedule for deeper topics or fresh projects; while still giving us a chance to know

Re: [Gimp-developer] State of Libre Graphics Union 2016 - call for Slides

2016-03-23 Thread Joao S. O. Bueno
On 23 March 2016 at 10:56, Alexandre Prokoudine wrote: > On Sun, Mar 20, 2016 at 9:40 PM, C R wrote: >> I'm doing the video for the Inkscape project. I can toss one together for >> GIMP as well (mentioned in previous emails) >> Is there still interest in this, or

Re: [Gimp-developer] An idea / feature for future releases of GIMP

2016-12-16 Thread Joao S. O. Bueno
Kindly provided to you by the Wilber Time Machine. On 16 December 2016 at 00:27, Alexandre Prokoudine wrote: > Already available since 2.9.2 :) > > 16 дек. 2016 г. 1:19 пользователь "M. Hammoud" > написал: > >> Hi. >> New users spend a lot of

Re: [Gimp-developer] GIMP-GEGL

2017-03-02 Thread Joao S. O. Bueno
Hi Diego - the main problem right now is that GEGL Python bindings are only possible from Python3 (with pygobject) - and GIMP-Python is stuck in Python2 + old GTK+ bindings. But your e-mail gave me an idea - not that I am currently with time to hack with it - but maybe use a module thta use a

Re: [Gimp-developer] Please migrate to GitHub/CMake

2017-05-08 Thread Joao S. O. Bueno
On 8 May 2017 at 09:47, gregory grey wrote: I can get why are you trying to poke Alexandre on that - you are on an absolute "shoot the messenger" weird thing there. > In my experience "ain't broke" is a standard mantra of organizations > stuck in the past. > > It's a

Re: [Gimp-developer] Fwd: selection of a colour using python filters

2017-05-24 Thread Joao S. O. Bueno
Moin - There is no current effort or intent to improve on the color selection for Python or Script-fu plug-ins. There are few developers on GIMP and they are focusing on other points of the codebase - You can open a feature-request on http://bugzilla.gnome.org - be sure to specify exactly what

Re: [Gimp-developer] Participation at Apple Developer Program

2018-03-26 Thread Joao S. O. Bueno
I voted yes - But I also think we could ask Apple for a direct sponsorship for the project (obviously, not limited to this amount - maybe 100 times as much is a reasonable value, given the value made available gratis for all Mac OS users.) Do we create another pool on that? Or can we figure out

Re: [Gimp-developer] GEGL Drop Shadow filter not working

2019-01-04 Thread Joao S. O. Bueno via gimp-developer-list
The GEGLized drop shadow filter is a big regressin in 2.10 - nonetheless it works, in a destructive way (while the legacy dropshadow works in a non destructive way, and even allows adjusting the effect by displacing the created shadow layer). So - it actually only works in a whole layer, is there

Re: [Gimp-developer] [Gimp-web] Alexandre Prokoudine attacks on GIMP critics around the Web

2018-11-16 Thread Joao S. O. Bueno via gimp-developer-list
Now when reading you people, I can understand why is it that Guido stepped down from being the Python head. And why the GIMP dev team really have an option of being more recluse - I should tell you that I'd be in the same category of Prokoudine - mention GIMP as "us", although my code

Re: [Gimp-developer] Editing last stroke / modification through gimp plugins

2019-03-27 Thread Joao S. O. Bueno via gimp-developer-list
No - the current PDB API + some extras in the Python bindings cannot "see" what the user is doing with any tool. Nor is anything related to the undo history exposed for plug-ins. Your described work around sounds like the only thing possible. You might want to try "pyautogui" module to check

Re: [Gimp-developer] We need a missing feature.

2019-03-27 Thread Joao S. O. Bueno via gimp-developer-list
It is possible to move otherwise unrelated layers if they are set as "linked" - To mark a layer as "linked", one should click just to the right of the "eye" icon on the layers dialog - a chain Icon shows up. All layers marked with the chain Icon will move (or be transformed) as a "temporary"

Re: [Gimp-developer] Gtk4

2019-02-13 Thread Joao S. O. Bueno via gimp-developer-list
So, from the post entitled "GTK 4.0 is not GTK 4", we read, with all letters: """In this way, “Gtk 4.0” is not “Gtk 4”. “Gtk 4.0” is the first raw version of what will eventually grow into “Gtk 4”, sometime around Gtk 4.6 (18 months later).""" So, it is actually not ready "a couple of weeks" from

Re: [Gimp-developer] Using GIMP in the textile industry

2019-05-28 Thread Joao S. O. Bueno via gimp-developer-list
Having read things to this point, a first short remark on the feature you mentioned of allowing a pattern rotation/scaling before filling up an area: That'd be great. I remember we used to have this as a feature request a long time ago (10+ years), and it was dismissed at some point. That was

Re: [Gimp-developer] Notice to documentation contributors: plans to update the gimp-help repository

2021-06-03 Thread Joao S. O. Bueno via gimp-developer-list
Just so that this does not feel like no one is reading: although there is a long time I do not fidle with the docs, all things listed seem quite reasonable. On Thu, 3 Jun 2021 at 13:36, Jehan Pagès via gimp-developer-list < gimp-developer-list@gnome.org> wrote: > Hi all, developers, documenters

Re: [Gimp-developer] New asset / extension manager

2021-12-04 Thread Joao S. O. Bueno via gimp-developer-list
No progress - But I've been talking to Americo over the last 2-3 weeks to start some movement on that direction. I had some work done in 2018, but it was a Python 2 plug-in with requirements for a server-side API - maybe I will revisit some of that I did not even know about this extension format

Re: [Gimp-developer] Making enabling dynamics a checkbox (Issue #4333)

2021-12-29 Thread Joao S. O. Bueno via gimp-developer-list
Maybe, instead of a redundant control to the already cluttered tool options, we could step back and try to get an easier way to find and select a desired dynamics (including the "Dynamics Off"). meanwhile, maybe just making it special so that it shows first on the dynamics list would be a nicer

Re: [Gimp-developer] Hello Developers

2021-12-11 Thread Joao S. O. Bueno via gimp-developer-list
If the plug-in is indeed the "Error Level Analyst" plug-in, it is a Python plug-in, and should work fine with GIMP 2.10. Please add some more information on the environment you are running GIMP (Linux/Windows/ Mac), GIMP version, and the error message - as the list blocks attachments, if you

[Gimp-developer] Adjustments on dynamics

2022-02-13 Thread Joao S. O. Bueno via gimp-developer-list
Hi folks - This is just to let it in written here that last Monday me, Ayreom, Jehan and Americo had a meeting concerning the current behavior of dynamics (both up to 2.10 and on 2.99) - and asserted some incorrect behaviors - These included but are not limited to the "spacings" dynamic output,

Re: [Gimp-developer] Introduction of new unique brush tool

2022-02-16 Thread Joao S. O. Bueno via gimp-developer-list
I had not tried it - but this feature has been a demand by some users. If we could talk into making this kind of mask a toggle for existing tools, instead of a whole new tool, I guess it could be really interesting. On Tue, Feb 15, 2022 at 1:54 PM sigetch via gimp-developer-list <

<    1   2