It is obvious that the current way of changing brush size is nearly unusable.
I have doubts however if your proposal would be the best way to have a
better UI, or if it is just a work around for the current behavior.
Above all, just because Richard steped up with a proposed UI behavior
for th e
Hi there -
As I've replied online to Alex - i am willing to mentor this year -
and we are still looking for more people to step up.
js
--
On 6 February 2015 at 13:19, Alexandre Prokoudine
alexandre.prokoud...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
Google Summer of Code 2015 is launching next week. I
Hi Alek_
it turns out that the Python bindings for GIMP had not been updated to
deal with higher precision images as of yet.
Don't despair - since you had built GIMP master, this is as good time
as any to get it going. :-)
You can get to know the image precision (and even set it) thorugh the
Alexandre:
Maybe he is referring to Portugal's portuguese
https://l10n.gnome.org/languages/pt/gnome-gimp/ui/
Or, more likely, to the development version - which is actually how I
started years ago.
Pedro -
Hi -
I use to be the maintainer of the Brazilian Portuguese translation for GIMP.
I
On 9 February 2015 at 09:15, Alexandre Prokoudine
alexandre.prokoud...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Feb 9, 2015 at 2:10 PM, Joao S. O. Bueno wrote:
In this particular case, I am in favor of restoring the extra-layer
creation behavior, or at least have a checkbox
to imply it. The uses I myself
Although the filter is intended to work that way, I consider it to be a bug.
As you know, GIMP 2.9 is still under heavy development, an done of the
pending things is to find-put a way
to have the classic plug-ins installed back again on a running GIMP
- that way, any regressions such as this
On 17 March 2015 at 18:20, Elle Stone ellest...@ninedegreesbelow.com wrote:
On 03/17/2015 02:51 PM, Joseph Bupe wrote:
Ok Alex, the progress bar in the link below is what I am referring to. It
appears between every tweak on the Cage transform tool.
Link:
Try using Select-To Path --
Everything you describe is already possible.
Although, maybe, selection-To path could have more usability if it
would change to the Path Tool, with the new path as active, so that
its nodes are displayed at once. Currently, one has to manually go to
the Paths dockable,
On 20 March 2015 at 13:43, Chandana Bandara cbsoftw...@gmail.com wrote:
Greetings from Chandana,
Hi Chandana -
welcome to this group.
Thank you for your suggestions.
In fact the workflow you suggest could be made explicitly possible in
the future as we move GIMP to
a non-destructive editing
On 11 March 2015 at 18:05, Ofnuts ofn...@gmx.com wrote:
On 11/03/15 14:26, Elle Stone wrote:
3. Scaling upon export:
When exporting an image for display on the web, the image usually needs to
be resized, and sometimes you might want to make some additional edits at
the reduced size before
Hi Marco -
What I like to do in cases like this is to enable
preferences-inbterface-Dynamic Keyboard shortcuts , (actually I
keep this always on), and assign a temporary shortcut to the action at
hand (in this case, shrink selection). ot having the overhead of going
through the keyboard
way), make
drawable.get_buffer directly available and returning a Gegl buffer
wrapped in a convenient Python object.
On 21 February 2015 at 00:49, Joao S. O. Bueno gwid...@gmail.com wrote:
Getting there... no need to poke me for now -
GIMP 2.9.1 Python Console
Python 2.7.5 (default, Nov 3 2014
,
0.0003035269910469651, 0.6235294342041016, 0.0003035269910469651,
0.0003035269910469651, 0.0003035269910469651, 0.6235294342041016,
0.0003035269910469651,...]
On 20 February 2015 at 09:50, Joao S. O. Bueno gwid...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Alek_
it turns out that the Python bindings for GIMP had
20, 2015 at 11:54 PM, Joao S. O. Bueno gwid...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi -
I've actually comitted the above method - but beware it is subject to
some changes.
I've added the precision read-only property to gimp-images, and the
get_data method
to drawables (layers and channels) -
get_data returns
directly available and returning a Gegl buffer
wrapped in a convenient Python object.
On 21 February 2015 at 00:49, Joao S. O. Bueno gwid...@gmail.com wrote:
Getting there... no need to poke me for now -
GIMP 2.9.1 Python Console
Python 2.7.5 (default, Nov 3 2014, 14:26:24)
[GCC 4.8.3
Hi Elle -
Seeing your e-mail give the same kind of and what can I do about it
feeling I have when talking to Americo (he should also be reading
this mailing list by now).
There are obvious lots of improvements that _could_ be done so that
GIMP would be a killer application.
What you do on the
Any tentative time set for the GIMP B.o.F. already?
So that those of us who could not make it this year can follow on irc.
On 28 April 2015 at 03:08, Michael Schumacher schum...@gmx.de wrote:
Hi all,
as in most years, some of us are at the Libre Graphics Meeting.
If you are in the area
On 15 April 2015 at 05:40, Simon Budig si...@budig.de wrote:
Gez (lis...@ohweb.com.ar) wrote:
[...] optional patch
that provides and easy way to remove the name GIMP from the UI,
replacing it for a different one?
Now, seriously. What do devs think about this idea? If somebody provided
a
On 27 May 2015 at 09:00, Boudewijn Rempt b...@valdyas.org wrote:
Only if they'd distribute gimp, which they, arguably aren't doing.
EEek! Time to go AGPL 3.0 :-)
___
gimp-developer-list mailing list
List address:gimp-developer-list@gnome.org
On 27 May 2015 at 09:49, Jehan Pagès jehan.marmott...@gmail.com wrote:
It also appears that the account the project page belongs to is
sf-editor1, and a lot of well known projects are listed on the user page:
http://sourceforge.net/u/sf-editor1/
As I openned the profile for that page to check
On 26 May 2015 at 12:08, Jernej Simončič jer...@ena.si wrote:
On Tuesday, May 26, 2015, 8:40:08, Ofnuts wrote:
Should this site be closed down entirely (assuming it is still under the
control of someone related to Gimp development)? There are still plenty
of links pointing to it, and it would
Sttting it programatically is likely a missing feature - it shouldbe
available as gimp-context-fade-set-length -- and yes, it has nothing
to do with percents
On 2 October 2015 at 09:51, Ofnuts wrote:
> I see that some changes have occured in that area in 2.8.14... However:
>
>
Therte is aproblem in migrating - because converting scripts to
Python3 nto that much of a hasle, but current PyGIMP uses PyGTK - and
_that_ is a problem - because we should them move the Python
itnerface to gobject introspection - and it would imply to move the
GIMP parts to use gobjetc
While it is is feasible to have Python3 as the system default install,
it is not practical to remove Python2 from the system. Even if it is
not installed by default (which I doubt very much) it will be
reachable via the default packaging system (and therefore available as
a GIMP dependency).
Dear Folks at GIMP -
The first presentation event in this years LGM program is ‘state of
Libre Graphics’. A common update for many of the projects across our
Libre Graphics community. This frees up room in the schedule for deeper
topics or fresh projects; while still giving us a chance to know
On 23 March 2016 at 10:56, Alexandre Prokoudine
wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 20, 2016 at 9:40 PM, C R wrote:
>> I'm doing the video for the Inkscape project. I can toss one together for
>> GIMP as well (mentioned in previous emails)
>> Is there still interest in this, or
Kindly provided to you by the Wilber Time Machine.
On 16 December 2016 at 00:27, Alexandre Prokoudine
wrote:
> Already available since 2.9.2 :)
>
> 16 дек. 2016 г. 1:19 пользователь "M. Hammoud"
> написал:
>
>> Hi.
>> New users spend a lot of
Hi Diego - the main problem right now is that GEGL Python bindings
are only possible from Python3 (with pygobject) - and GIMP-Python is
stuck in Python2 + old GTK+ bindings.
But your e-mail gave me an idea - not that I am currently with time to
hack with it - but maybe use a module thta use a
On 8 May 2017 at 09:47, gregory grey wrote:
I can get why are you trying to poke Alexandre on that - you are on an absolute
"shoot the messenger" weird thing there.
> In my experience "ain't broke" is a standard mantra of organizations
> stuck in the past.
>
> It's a
Moin -
There is no current effort or intent to improve on the color selection
for Python or Script-fu plug-ins.
There are few developers on GIMP and they are focusing on other points
of the codebase -
You can open a feature-request on http://bugzilla.gnome.org - be sure
to specify exactly what
I voted yes -
But I also think we could ask Apple for a direct sponsorship for the
project (obviously, not limited to this amount - maybe 100 times as
much is a reasonable value,
given the value made available gratis for all Mac OS users.)
Do we create another pool on that? Or can we figure out
The GEGLized drop shadow filter is a big regressin in 2.10 -
nonetheless it works, in a destructive way (while the legacy
dropshadow works in a
non destructive way, and even allows adjusting the effect by
displacing the created
shadow layer).
So - it actually only works in a whole layer, is there
Now when reading you people, I can understand why
is it that Guido stepped down from being the Python head.
And why the GIMP dev team really have an option of being more recluse -
I should tell you that I'd be in the same category of Prokoudine -
mention GIMP as "us", although my code
No - the current PDB API + some extras in the Python bindings cannot "see"
what the user
is doing with any tool. Nor is anything related to the undo history exposed
for plug-ins.
Your described work around sounds like the only thing possible.
You might want to try "pyautogui" module to check
It is possible to move otherwise unrelated layers if they are set as
"linked" -
To mark a layer as "linked", one should click just to the right of the
"eye" icon
on the layers dialog - a chain Icon shows up.
All layers marked with the chain Icon will move (or be transformed) as a
"temporary"
So, from the post entitled "GTK 4.0 is not GTK 4", we read, with all
letters:
"""In this way, “Gtk 4.0” is not “Gtk 4”. “Gtk 4.0” is the first raw
version of what will eventually grow into “Gtk 4”, sometime around Gtk 4.6
(18 months later)."""
So, it is actually not ready "a couple of weeks" from
Having read things to this point, a first short remark on
the feature you mentioned of allowing a pattern rotation/scaling before
filling up an area:
That'd be great. I remember we used to have this as a feature request a
long time ago
(10+ years), and it was dismissed at some point. That was
Just so that this does not feel like no one is reading:
although there is a long time I do not fidle with the docs,
all things listed seem quite reasonable.
On Thu, 3 Jun 2021 at 13:36, Jehan Pagès via gimp-developer-list <
gimp-developer-list@gnome.org> wrote:
> Hi all, developers, documenters
No progress -
But I've been talking to Americo over the last 2-3 weeks to start some
movement on that direction.
I had some work done in 2018, but it was a Python 2 plug-in with
requirements for a server-side API -
maybe I will revisit some of that
I did not even know about this extension format
Maybe, instead of a redundant control to the already cluttered tool options,
we could step back and try to get an easier way to find and select a desired
dynamics (including the "Dynamics Off"). meanwhile, maybe just
making it special so that it shows first on the dynamics list would
be a nicer
If the plug-in is indeed the "Error Level Analyst" plug-in, it is a Python
plug-in, and should work fine with GIMP 2.10.
Please add some more information on the environment you are running GIMP
(Linux/Windows/ Mac), GIMP version, and
the error message - as the list blocks attachments, if you
Hi folks -
This is just to let it in written here that last Monday me, Ayreom, Jehan
and Americo
had a meeting concerning the current behavior of dynamics (both up to 2.10
and on 2.99) -
and asserted some incorrect behaviors -
These included but are not limited to the "spacings"
dynamic output,
I had not tried it - but this feature has been a demand by some users.
If we could talk into making this kind of mask a toggle for existing tools,
instead of a whole new tool, I guess it could be really interesting.
On Tue, Feb 15, 2022 at 1:54 PM sigetch via gimp-developer-list <
101 - 143 of 143 matches
Mail list logo