Heh, I've seen ofnuts post before so I don't mind onboarding him.
On Fri, Oct 6, 2017 at 5:10 PM, Pat David wrote:
> I can vouch for Ofnuts not being an awful malicious actor. But I can’t
> vouch for him not being awful. :D (I kid, I kid).
>
> On Fri, Oct 6, 2017 at 6:19 PM
I can vouch for Ofnuts not being an awful malicious actor. But I can’t
vouch for him not being awful. :D (I kid, I kid).
On Fri, Oct 6, 2017 at 6:19 PM Ofnuts wrote:
> On 10/06/17 19:29, Sam Gleske wrote:
> > If anybody is interested in joining me as an admin for maintaining the
On 10/06/17 19:29, Sam Gleske wrote:
If anybody is interested in joining me as an admin for maintaining the GIMP
CI server I encourage anybody to reach out to me regardless of your skill
level. Even if you're new to Linux and wish to get better at Linux (zero
experience) I'm willing to provide
Hi Sam!
I would be happy to help out if I can. Not sure what I can do, but at
least I'll try not to make life harder. ;)
Reach me via email or #gimp.
On Fri, Oct 6, 2017 at 12:30 PM Sam Gleske wrote:
> Hello gimp-dev and community,
> I'd like to apologize for my
Hey Michael,
I do not get bugzilla notifications on this but I am actually aware of the
issue and have been working on it for a few days now since I know
gimp-master builds were failing.
On Thu, Oct 5, 2017 at 5:03 PM, Michael Schumacher wrote:
> On 10/05/2017 04:08 PM, Jehan
Hello gimp-dev and community,
I'd like to apologize for my remarks. I think my pride got in the way a
bit and I definitely misunderstood the intent of the thread. Hopefully, my
reaction does not turn of RedHat for wanting to contribute. I will take
this as an opportunity to reflect on my
On 10/05/2017 04:08 PM, Jehan Pagès wrote:
> Hello Sam,
[...]
> I don't really understand what triggers this sudden anger but I see
> you are quoting one of my last emails. And if that is your trigger,
> then you got the opposite of its meaning since what it meant is that
> *you* were the one
Hello Sam,
On Thu, Oct 5, 2017 at 9:15 AM, Sam Gleske wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, Feb 10, 2017 at 6:03 AM, Jehan Pagès
> wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Fri, Feb 10, 2017 at 10:20 AM, gregory grey wrote:
>> > I know about build.gimp.org.
On Thu, Oct 05, 2017 at 12:15:36AM -0700, Sam Gleske wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 10, 2017 at 6:03 AM, Jehan Pagès
> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Fri, Feb 10, 2017 at 10:20 AM, gregory grey wrote:
> > > I know about build.gimp.org.
> > >
> > > I just wanted
On Fri, Feb 10, 2017 at 6:03 AM, Jehan Pagès
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Fri, Feb 10, 2017 at 10:20 AM, gregory grey wrote:
> > I know about build.gimp.org.
> >
> > I just wanted to raise this question to the attention of the team - of
> > whether there is
On Fri, 2017-02-10 at 09:26 +0100, gregory grey wrote:
> Hiya, I'm awaiting feedback from Sam on the same topic here. Count me
> in on any related activities.
>
> One of my questions would be if anyone ever considered using Travis
> CI, which is taken case of by themselves and is used by lots of
Hi Jehan,
On Thu, 2017-02-09 at 23:52 +0100, Jehan Pagès wrote:
> Hello Vladimir,
>
> Unless mistaken, we never had any follow-up on your help proposition.
> We are still very interested in any help on automatic testing
> procedures. Our current continuous builds have been really shaky these
>
Hi,
On Fri, Feb 10, 2017 at 10:02 AM, Vladimír Beneš wrote:
> Hi Jehan,
>
> On Thu, 2017-02-09 at 23:52 +0100, Jehan Pagès wrote:
>> Hello Vladimir,
>>
>> Unless mistaken, we never had any follow-up on your help proposition.
>> We are still very interested in any help on
Hi,
On Fri, Feb 10, 2017 at 10:20 AM, gregory grey wrote:
> I know about build.gimp.org.
>
> I just wanted to raise this question to the attention of the team - of
> whether there is a need to support own CI if security is not an
> issue.It is literally only reason people do
I know about build.gimp.org.
I just wanted to raise this question to the attention of the team - of
whether there is a need to support own CI if security is not an
issue.It is literally only reason people do that now when we have
travis-ci.org/https://circleci.com/etc.Travis is even free for
build.gimp.org
10 февр. 2017 г. 11:26 пользователь "gregory grey"
написал:
> Hiya, I'm awaiting feedback from Sam on the same topic here. Count me
> in on any related activities.
>
> One of my questions would be if anyone ever considered using Travis
> CI, which is taken case
Hiya, I'm awaiting feedback from Sam on the same topic here. Count me
in on any related activities.
One of my questions would be if anyone ever considered using Travis
CI, which is taken case of by themselves and is used by lots of
opensource projects.
2017-02-09 23:52 GMT+01:00 Jehan Pagès
Hello Vladimir,
Unless mistaken, we never had any follow-up on your help proposition.
We are still very interested in any help on automatic testing
procedures. Our current continuous builds have been really shaky these
last months, with server issues for months at a time, and such. We
would
Hi Vladimir,
On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 2:33 PM, Vladimír Beneš wrote:
> Hi all,
> we (at Red Hat) are very interested in GIMP as we do use it and we also
> do test it (but not the latests releases). We would like to start or
> participate in an automated testing efforts of
Hi all,
we (at Red Hat) are very interested in GIMP as we do use it and we also
do test it (but not the latests releases). We would like to start or
participate in an automated testing efforts of upstream releases or
possibly master branch. I am not sure if you have anything ready for
automated
20 matches
Mail list logo