On 10/24/20 5:43 AM, marc...@seznam.cz wrote:
Now, you are right that there's one inconsistency, gimp color picker's xyY is
not the same as to what is being pushed to the operation. I've got the same
color picker result as you have.
Well, actually everything I said was right :) . Which
> So if changing the rendering intent does make even a small difference
I tested that again and there's no difference at all between perceptual and
relative colorimetric.
But I tried converting with saturation and absolute colorimetric and gimp
stdouts that those conversions seem to be not
On 10/23/20 6:17 AM, JonnyRobbie via gimp-developer-list wrote:
When first opened, the image is in Built-in sRGB and the top row is pure rgb,
that is 255,0,0; 0,255,0; 0,0,255. And when running my small gegl operation, I
get this stdout in CIExyY color space:
Input pixels x=0.653898,
First things first. The C code for gegl operation I use here that prints the
pixels in CIE xyY color space is below.
I apologize that it's an unnecessary composer3 class, but that's what I had
handy as a template.
I also attached a very small (3x3) test image `33time.xcf`.
When first opened,
