On 04/06/2016 12:30 AM, Sven Claussner wrote:
Hi Elle,
Hi Sven,
On 5.4.2016 at 10:55 PM Elle Stone wrote:
I started a branch of this current thread to ask some specific questions
regarding a couple of babl functions that might be useful for conveying
RGB color space information from GIMP to
On 04/04/2016 05:36 PM, C R wrote:
Only so many hours in the day. For RAW processing Darktable works fine.
Back when I switched from Photoshop, RAW editing was still done via
plugin, and if you were serious about it, you'd do it in Adobe Lightroom.
Back when I switched from PhotoShop, I had al
Hi Elle,
On 5.4.2016 at 10:55 PM Elle Stone wrote:
On 04/05/2016 02:10 PM, Sven Claussner wrote:
Hi,
On 4.4.2016 at 3:56 PM Elle Stone wrote:
On 03/27/2016 02:44 PM, C R wrote:
* The ability to edit in RGB working color spaces other than sRGB.
I'm for this, too.
sRGB is from the 1990's an
On 04/05/2016 02:10 PM, Sven Claussner wrote:
Hi,
On 4.4.2016 at 3:56 PM Elle Stone wrote:
On 03/27/2016 02:44 PM, C R wrote:
* The ability to edit in RGB working color spaces other than sRGB.
I'm for this, too.
sRGB is from the 1990's and made for the web.
Life goes on. Modern monitors aim
Hi,
On 4.4.2016 at 3:56 PM Elle Stone wrote:
On 03/27/2016 02:44 PM, C R wrote:
* The ability to edit in RGB working color spaces other than sRGB.
I'm for this, too.
sRGB is from the 1990's and made for the web.
Life goes on. Modern monitors aim to get as much AdobeRGB coverage
as possible an
5 апр. 2016 г. 18:57 пользователь "Elle Stone" написал:
> I do appreciate that editing in color spaces other than sRGB is now on
the official Roadmap. However, it's on the Roadmap for "Future GIMP".
Anything in that section can be moved to e.g. 3.2 provided there is a
developer working on any of
On 04/05/2016 11:59 AM, Elle Stone wrote:
timeline for past GIMP releases:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GIMP_version_history
___
gimp-developer-list mailing list
List address:gimp-developer-list@gnome.org
List membership: https://mail.gnome.org/m
On 04/05/2016 04:07 AM, Alexandre Prokoudine wrote:
4 апр. 2016 г. 20:10 пользователь "Elle Stone" написал:
But what about the ability to edit in color spaces other than sRGB? Is
this less or more of a priority than nondestructive editing?
We've had this conversation before. This is how
http:
4 апр. 2016 г. 20:10 пользователь "Elle Stone" написал:
> But what about the ability to edit in color spaces other than sRGB? Is
this less or more of a priority than nondestructive editing?
We've had this conversation before. This is how
http://wiki.gimp.org/wiki/Roadmap got adjusted to specifica
>
> I'm sure if they require something other than sRGB, they will want
>> Photoshop (at the moment).
>> Of course, that is a self-imposed limitation. Suggesting that
>> professional results can only be gotten outside sRGB is untrue.
>>
>
> "Professional results" and "self-imposed limitation" are tw
On 04/04/2016 01:54 PM, C R wrote:
On Mon, Apr 4, 2016 at 2:56 PM, Elle Stone
mailto:ellest...@ninedegreesbelow.com>>
wrote:
Putting the serious limitations of 8-bit editing to one side, even
high bit depth GIMP 2.9/2.10 lacks critically important components
of the workflows of (l
I will say that it would be nice to have a recommended hardware to run
GIMP. I know this is Free and Open Source Software and you can pretty much
run it one anything as well as we are not Photoshop and are not worried
about sails and making sure that the customer is running the best hardware
to ru
On 04/04/2016 12:28 PM, Øyvind Kolås wrote:
One of the primary reason some of us have has as motivation for
working on GEGL and its integration in GIMP for more than a decade is
not high bit depth support, but non-destructive editing features like
"adjustment layers" and "smart objects". As has
On Mon, Apr 4, 2016 at 4:19 PM, Partha Bagchi wrote:
> Also, I would think that nondestructive
> editing would be high on the list (Photoshop's "Smart Objects").
>
> If I am not mistaken, Alex has already mentioned adjustment layers numerous
> times in past as a requirement/missing feature in GIMP
Totally agree with you. Color management would definitely be a priority for
high-end photo editing software. Also, I would think that nondestructive
editing would be high on the list (Photoshop's "Smart Objects").
If I am not mistaken, Alex has already mentioned adjustment layers numerous
times in
On 03/27/2016 02:44 PM, C R wrote:
I've found that anything else would be a waste of
(everyone's) time. For some, nothing but Photoshop will work for their
graphics needs. It's no use arguing with them, because they have already
made up their mind, and it's more important to think they are correc
> > It would also be nice if people could see good reasons not to comment,
> > as one user has posted online (I think at answers.yahoo.com), that GIMP
> > is "not as good as Photoshop".
>
> What do you expect us to do about it?
>
> Alex
>
On answers.yahoo.com, it seems to me that anyone from the c
On Sun, Mar 27, 2016 at 8:22 PM, mailreader wrote:
> It would also be nice if people could see good reasons not to comment,
> as one user has posted online (I think at answers.yahoo.com), that GIMP
> is "not as good as Photoshop".
What do you expect us to do about it?
Alex
__
I recommend this small change to the current download page:
www.opendesignstudio.org/gimp/samples/gimp_download_file_size.png
On Sun, Mar 27, 2016 at 7:44 PM, C R wrote:
> Actually, I'm on Linux, and I don't see the file size listed either.
> I don't personally care much, because I know that GIM
Actually, I'm on Linux, and I don't see the file size listed either.
I don't personally care much, because I know that GIMP is damn small
compared to most high-powered graphics applications, but still I can see
that some folks may care the first time they download from the website.
If anything, th
* mailrea...@juno.com [03-27-16 13:30]:
> It would be nice if the website said how much free space is required to
> download the program and to run it, and what other things might be
> useful to use with it and where they can be found and how big they are.
They are but you apparently are not fami
It would be nice if the website said how much free space is required to
download the program and to run it, and what other things might be useful to
use with it and where they can be found and how big they are.
It would also be nice if people could see good reasons not to comment, as one
user ha
Here are the suggestions:
1- When you are using the scale or rotate tool and try to insert a guide, it
doesn't close the tool.
You mean, the suggestion is to _not_ close thew tool? :)
Yes, that's it! I thought that could work well with my other suggestion,
snapping the guides to
>
> 2- add the option to snap guides at the border and/or center of layers
> bounds.
Relative snapping/positioning has been on my mind a lot! A lot of times
when making banners or brochures, I just want one layer aligned at the same
horizontal or vertical position or with same height or width. I
On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 8:22 AM, wanderer wrote:
> Here are the suggestions:
>
> 1- When you are using the scale or rotate tool and try to insert a guide, it
> doesn't close the tool.
You mean, the suggestion is to _not_ close thew tool? :)
> 2- add the option to snap guides at the border and/or
Hello!
I'm new here, so first of all I would like to say it's a wonderful job
that has been done in 2.8. Knowing a little bit of programming, I
thought I might help with minor improvements to the software.
So, I came up with these little improvements to Gimp that would make it
better, in my
26 matches
Mail list logo