On Wed, 11 Dec 2002 01:40:05 -0800, "Robin Rowe" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> More docs.
>
> http://filmgimp.sourceforge.net/docs/which.gimp.html
I think that some parts of this article are really inaccurate and are
likely to cause some unnecessary damage to the reputation of both
projects (G
Raphaël,
> It looks like you have a bad opinion
> of the GIMP developers, but I hope that you will change your mind
Although it doesn't improve my opinion that you lead with a personal attack
misrepresenting my throughts, I do not in general have a "bad opinion" of
GIMP developers. I do find
On 11 Dec 2002, at 13:58, Raphaël Quinet wrote:
[trying to refute ... what?]
As to the distributions thing: www.gimp.org is the place where you
get the source. Binaries distributed from that site are just a matter
of courtesy. This is not favouring or hating Windows. If anything,
www.gimp.org fav
On Wed, 11 Dec 2002 09:06:29 -0800, "Robin Rowe" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Raphaël,
> > It looks like you have a bad opinion
> > of the GIMP developers, but I hope that you will change your mind
>
> Although it doesn't improve my opinion that you lead with a personal attack
> misrepresentin
