Nick Lamb wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 12, 2003 at 12:38:26PM +0200, Sven Neumann wrote:
> > Oh, will you? I am sorry but if I remember correctly we postponed this
> > until after 2.0 since we hope that until then there well be an
> > accepted Free Desktop standard for this. Our prefered solution would
> >
Hi,
David Neary <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> That's a fairly big assumption :) 2.0 pre 1 (which will be
> absolutely string & feature frozen to give translators, documentors
> and the like time to clean up before 2.0) is planned for a
> fortnights time. There are only 2 or 3 blockers left for th
Hi Simon,
So...there are they guys talking about pre1 already...
I could not have the time for myself to even compile 1.3.20 yet (will
do in a few minutes, I hope)
How is the vector stuff? Are the itnernal representaions, if note all
thetouchs on the UI finished?
If s, I believe tha
Joao S. O. Bueno wrote:
> Hi Simon,
>
> So...there are they guys talking about pre1 already...
We've been talking about that since camp :)
> How is the vector stuff? Are the itnernal representaions, if note all
> thetouchs on the UI finished?
People are waiting for me... I have spent as
Hi,
David Neary <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > How is the vector stuff? Are the itnernal representaions, if note
> > all the touchs on the UI finished?
>
> People are waiting for me... I have spent as much time as I have
> had in the last week or so on libart stroking. Hopefully a decent
> run
Joao S. O. Bueno ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> How is the vector stuff? Are the itnernal representaions, if note all
> thetouchs on the UI finished?
I think the stuff is pretty stable internally. The functionality seems
to be OK and the remaining stuff basically is polishing.
>From the PDB point
