Hello,
I need to make an external Python administration script, wich
occasionnally uses gimp functionnality (especially to convert to/from
xcf files). Is there a way to use this functionnality without starting
the ui?
I need something like that:
import gimp_noui as gimp
gimp.s
On Thu, Mar 30, 2006 at 03:31:12PM +0200, Ministeyr wrote:
> I need to make an external Python administration script, wich
> occasionnally uses gimp functionnality (especially to convert to/from
> xcf files). Is there a way to use this functionnality without starting
> the ui?
> I need something
On Thu, Mar 30, 2006 at 03:31:12PM +0200, Ministeyr wrote:
> Hello,
> I need to make an external Python administration script, wich
> occasionnally uses gimp functionnality (especially to convert to/from
> xcf files). Is there a way to use this functionnality without starting
> the ui?
> I need
Just write a pygimp script normally, and call it via gimp's batch mode.
-Yosh
I would prefer another solution, since I have some processing to do in
the external script and possibly a bunch of data to transfer back and
forth, so it would make the script quite complex to have to use the
batch
what os will you be using this on?
carol
I'm developping it for and under a Debian-testing system (on amd k7),
and plan to use it possibly also on an Ubuntu Linux.
I won't need windows support.
Ministeyr
___
Gimp-developer mailing list
Gimp-develo
On Thu, Mar 30, 2006 at 07:59:08PM +0200, Ministeyr wrote:
> >Just write a pygimp script normally, and call it via gimp's batch mode.
> >
> >-Yosh
>
> I would prefer another solution, since I have some processing to do in
> the external script and possibly a bunch of data to transfer back and
>
On Thu, Mar 30, 2006 at 08:02:51PM +0200, Ministeyr wrote:
> >what os will you be using this on?
> >
> >carol
>
> I'm developping it for and under a Debian-testing system (on amd k7),
> and plan to use it possibly also on an Ubuntu Linux.
> I won't need windows support.
>
i asked because i put i
Hi,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (2006-03-26 at 1302.53 +0300):
> On Fri, 2006-03-24 at 07:48 +0100, Marc Lehmann wrote:
[...]
> > Its not clear to me wether it can be improved. I personally think the
> > best way would be to have two modes, switchable via some setting. Some
> > people just don't want to use
