On 6/7/06, Joao S. O. Bueno Calligaris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Tuesday 06 June 2006 12:25 pm, Dave Neary wrote:
Let's put it in these terms:
Pippin?
can that stuff run a washed out GIMP or Horizon? What do you think
about matching it against the 770?
Stripping down/reorganizing GIMPs use
(Delurk: I'm a sporadic developer of plugins, some of which are almost
good enough to shove in the registry, and I've watched this list for a
few months)
One of my current projects is a multifrequency blend tool (inspired
by, but not based on, the enblend program), and as part of its
operation, it
On 6/7/06, Toby Speight <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
(Delurk: I'm a sporadic developer of plugins, some of which are almost
good enough to shove in the registry, and I've watched this list for a
few months)
One of my current projects is a multifrequency blend tool (inspired
by, but not based on, t
0> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
0> Nathan Summers mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ("Nathan") wrote:
Nathan> "Cancelling" a plugin kills it unconditionally. It's been a
Nathan> few months since I looked at that code, but I'm fairly sure
Nathan> that there is no way for a plug-in to catch that it's be
Hi,
On Wed, 2006-06-07 at 17:36 +0100, Toby Speight wrote:
> While we're on this subject - obviously the plug-in process has no
> chance to clear up if it's killed outright,
Well, in theory it could catch the signal and clean up before it exits.
> so what happens to e.g. undo stack in this case
On Wed, 2006-06-07 at 19:54 +0200, Sven Neumann wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, 2006-06-07 at 17:36 +0100, Toby Speight wrote:
>
> > While we're on this subject - obviously the plug-in process has no
> > chance to clear up if it's killed outright,
>
> Well, in theory it could catch the signal and clean
