No objections--- mostly I would urge developers to plan what they're
going to do, make the changes, and stick to it. I know that's always
been the plan but it doesn't feel like it when you're using the
different versions. The random UI changes that appear in each release
throw off folks who use
On Sun, Sep 13, 2009 at 5:49 AM, us3...@web.de wrote:
And if GEGL provides this ability by default, why not using it in GIMP? :)
I believe that is exactly what's planned. It's alot of work and so
will take time.
It's also the case that GEGL is not as complete as Gimp, at least not
yet. It
On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 12:53 AM, Laxminarayan Kamath
kamat...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 10:15 AM, David Gowers 00a...@gmail.com wrote:
Call it the Gnu IMP.
This has to be facetiousness, doesn't it?
What about FreeMI ? standing for Freedom to Manipulate Images?
*if* the GTK
if it were more canonical, people would already be calling it Gnu IMP
or IMP). That's fair enough.. IMP *is* a better name (and people who
object to it on religious grounds probably are terminally humorless),
Actually I think there are quite a few people who would be more open
to using the
