Re: [Gimp-developer] Question on new (2.8) paint dynamics

2010-05-20 Thread Alexia Death
On Thu, May 20, 2010 at 7:13 AM, Rob Antonishen
rob.antonis...@gmail.com wrote:
 I have looked at some of the previews and devel paint dynamic
 reports/reviews and still have a couple questions.

 In amongst all those settings is there any trace a source layer as an 
 option?
No. and there wont be one in this iteration either. Its nontrivial and
probably pretty slow to access pixel under cursor for dynamics
evaluation and the whole thing needs to stabilize first. there are
other simpler dynamics inputs that are proposed, but not happening for
2.8, like the position of the cursor in the image.

 And along with that is there a brush dynamic to control the gamma of a
 brush while painting?  (This would be much like hardness for
 parametric brushes but for colour (stamp) type brushes would have some
 value).

What do you mean by gamma? There is the Force output. It tries to
emulate the force a brush is applied  to the canvas with, that
saturates some parts of the brush when applied. It has been part of
gimp for ages, under the name of hardness but it is not really
hardness as used in vector brushes so it has a new name now.

-- 
--Alexia
___
Gimp-developer mailing list
Gimp-developer@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU
https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer


Re: [Gimp-developer] Question on new (2.8) paint dynamics

2010-05-20 Thread Rob Antonishen
I will have to play with the force setting. I a looking to have a
pixmap brush be lighter or darker based on brush pressure. Maybe
explained like a dynamic dodge/burn applied to the brush source while
painting?


-Rob A

On 5/20/10, Alexia Death alexiade...@gmail.com wrote:
 On Thu, May 20, 2010 at 7:13 AM, Rob Antonishen
 rob.antonis...@gmail.com wrote:
 I have looked at some of the previews and devel paint dynamic
 reports/reviews and still have a couple questions.

 In amongst all those settings is there any trace a source layer as an
 option?
 No. and there wont be one in this iteration either. Its nontrivial and
 probably pretty slow to access pixel under cursor for dynamics
 evaluation and the whole thing needs to stabilize first. there are
 other simpler dynamics inputs that are proposed, but not happening for
 2.8, like the position of the cursor in the image.

 And along with that is there a brush dynamic to control the gamma of a
 brush while painting?  (This would be much like hardness for
 parametric brushes but for colour (stamp) type brushes would have some
 value).

 What do you mean by gamma? There is the Force output. It tries to
 emulate the force a brush is applied  to the canvas with, that
 saturates some parts of the brush when applied. It has been part of
 gimp for ages, under the name of hardness but it is not really
 hardness as used in vector brushes so it has a new name now.

 --
 --Alexia


-- 
Sent from my mobile device
___
Gimp-developer mailing list
Gimp-developer@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU
https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer


Re: [Gimp-developer] Question on new (2.8) paint dynamics

2010-05-20 Thread Joao S. O. Bueno
On Thu, May 20, 2010 at 10:35 AM, Rob Antonishen
rob.antonis...@gmail.com wrote:
 I will have to play with the force setting. I a looking to have a
 pixmap brush be lighter or darker based on brush pressure. Maybe
 explained like a dynamic dodge/burn applied to the brush source while
 painting?

Features apart, Rob, you can use some sort of source layer tracking
by using the clone tool instead. Just use it in registered mode, and
explore the painting modes/ painting on the layer mask, etc...

Regards,

   js





 -Rob A

 On 5/20/10, Alexia Death alexiade...@gmail.com wrote:
 On Thu, May 20, 2010 at 7:13 AM, Rob Antonishen
 rob.antonis...@gmail.com wrote:
 I have looked at some of the previews and devel paint dynamic
 reports/reviews and still have a couple questions.

 In amongst all those settings is there any trace a source layer as an
 option?
 No. and there wont be one in this iteration either. Its nontrivial and
 probably pretty slow to access pixel under cursor for dynamics
 evaluation and the whole thing needs to stabilize first. there are
 other simpler dynamics inputs that are proposed, but not happening for
 2.8, like the position of the cursor in the image.

 And along with that is there a brush dynamic to control the gamma of a
 brush while painting?  (This would be much like hardness for
 parametric brushes but for colour (stamp) type brushes would have some
 value).

 What do you mean by gamma? There is the Force output. It tries to
 emulate the force a brush is applied  to the canvas with, that
 saturates some parts of the brush when applied. It has been part of
 gimp for ages, under the name of hardness but it is not really
 hardness as used in vector brushes so it has a new name now.

 --
 --Alexia


 --
 Sent from my mobile device
 ___
 Gimp-developer mailing list
 Gimp-developer@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU
 https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer

___
Gimp-developer mailing list
Gimp-developer@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU
https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer


[Gimp-developer] Question on new (2.8) paint dynamics

2010-05-19 Thread Rob Antonishen
I have looked at some of the previews and devel paint dynamic
reports/reviews and still have a couple questions.

In amongst all those settings is there any trace a source layer as an option?

Like ID a greyscale source layer and have the brush dynamics follow
that (i.e. brush size or opacity based on the value of the source
layer at that point)?

And along with that is there a brush dynamic to control the gamma of a
brush while painting?  (This would be much like hardness for
parametric brushes but for colour (stamp) type brushes would have some
value).

Thanks in advance-

-Rob A
___
Gimp-developer mailing list
Gimp-developer@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU
https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer