[Gimp-developer] Re: Re: SOC - brush system

2006-05-07 Thread GSR - FR
Hi,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (2006-05-07 at 1754.05 -0700):
  New tools? Why not improving the basic brush system (sometimes with
  artificial limits, see animated brushes workflow or pixmap scaling)
  and let all tools make use of it? Erase, airbrush and so on... 
 To refresh people's memory, Philip is the person who wrote 
 the code that lets the transform tools preview inside the
 image, along with a number of other fancy things.  He doesn't
 even really need mentoring -- but if the SoC program could give
 him enough support to let him devote his summer to GIMP coding,
 I think that would be a good thing.  (It is also compatible
 with the SoC rules, as long as he is a student.)

You refreshed my memory and confused my mind, as I am just pointing
that new tools sound silly, when a more general brush system seems the
solution. Take ink tool, I think it could have been done by just set
the brush tip to react to things like speed and angle, and any tool
would benefit, be paint or erase or whatever. So no idea how my
phrases could trigger your comment or why you quoted them. ?:-|

GSR
 
___
Gimp-developer mailing list
Gimp-developer@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU
https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer


Re: [Gimp-developer] Re: Re: SOC - brush system

2006-05-07 Thread William Skaggs


GSR - FR wrote:
 I am just pointing that new tools sound silly, when a more general brush 
 system seems the solution. Take ink tool, I think it could have been done 
 by just set the brush tip to react to things like speed and angle,

The ink tool is actually a good example, because it works in
a completely different way than any of the Paintbrush tools -- it
uses an array of interacting ink blobs, rather than just brush
marks.  Possibly it could be imitated by making brushes fancier,
but the tool you get that way would be completely different from
the current ink tool at the algorithm level.

But the important point I was trying to make, which I will repeat, is
that I think we should encourage Philip to apply without worrying too
much at this moment about the exact details of his plans -- there
is plenty of time to talk that over later.

Also, I only quoted you in order to establish context, and if
it sounded bad, that was completely unintentional.

  -- Bill
 

 
__ __ __ __
Sent via the CNPRC Email system at primate.ucdavis.edu


 
   
___
Gimp-developer mailing list
Gimp-developer@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU
https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer