Joël-Alexis Bialkiewicz ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> On 1/26/06, Simon Budig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Joël-Alexis Bialkiewicz ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > >
> > > In fact I don't want to ignore selections but to use them in a different
> > > way. Especially, I would like to be able know
On 1/26/06, Simon Budig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Joël-Alexis Bialkiewicz ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:>> In fact I don't want to ignore selections but to use them in a different> way. Especially, I would like to be able know, for a specific point, whether
> it is selected or not.You can request the
Joël-Alexis Bialkiewicz ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> On 1/26/06, Simon Budig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > The selection gets respected when you're using shadow tiles and use
> > gimp_drawable_merge_shadow. You can ignore the selection by not using
> > shadow tiles IIRC, I am at the moment not sur
On 1/26/06, Simon Budig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The selection gets respected when you're using shadow tiles and usegimp_drawable_merge_shadow. You can ignore the selection by not usingshadow tiles IIRC, I am at the moment not sure how this would affect the
undo system if you don't use shadow til
Joël-Alexis Bialkiewicz ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> My primary hypothesis is that gimp gives the full image (or a square portion
> of it including all selections) when you call gimp_drawable_mask_bounds, and
> that when you write your results using gimp_drawable_update, it just updates
> the selec
I need to implement an inpainting algorithm as a gimp plugin.I am going to start coding very soon.I read the plugin-template, and the plugin development tutorial, but I still have a problem figuring how selections are managed by the GIMP.
I experimented with the dummy plugin (blur) given in the tut
