Hi,
On Fri, 2007-06-08 at 16:10 -0400, Daniel Richard G. wrote:
> What is the intention behind version-controlling those files? I didn't
> notice anything particularly painful to generate.
Most of these files are in SVN because they contain translatable
strings. The message catalogs are built f
On Fri, 2007 Jun 08 21:10:22 +0200, Sven Neumann wrote:
>
> Actually, now that we accepted some of the proposed changes, building
> outside the source directory is somewhat broken. We have generated files
> that are intentionally kept under version control. If you build with
> srcdir != builddir a
Hi,
On Fri, 2007-06-08 at 20:51 +0200, Sven Neumann wrote:
> > This will all help to keep generated files out of a version-controlled
> > working source tree. (The fewer question marks you get from "svn stat", the
> > better.)
Actually, now that we accepted some of the proposed changes, buildi
Hi,
On Fri, 2007-06-08 at 01:53 -0400, Daniel Richard G. wrote:
> With these bug fixes going in, not only is it now possible to build GIMP
> from a clean/read-only SVN tree (i.e. only touched with ./autogen.sh),
> "make distcheck" is working too. Well, almost, but it's very nearly there.
>
>
With these bug fixes going in, not only is it now possible to build GIMP
from a clean/read-only SVN tree (i.e. only touched with ./autogen.sh),
"make distcheck" is working too. Well, almost, but it's very nearly there.
Fixes for "make dist" from a clean/ro SVN tree
http://bugzill
I'd like to draw attention to two bugs I encountered in building GIMP,
both having to do with my slightly-less-than-conventional approach to same:
srcdir vs. builddir fixes for out-of-source-tree builds
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=444960
Empty SCHEME_EXPORT
