The problem was in font. Cyrillic glyphs (which I wanted to use) were
in second half of ascii table, while in expected position in unicode table
there were some other (dumb) cyrillci glyphs. This is the problem of all
old truetype fonts. fontforge (pfaedit in past) has very nice feature,
you may co
Hi,
Oleg Bartunov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Please read http://gimp.org/unix/fonts.html
>
> I have no problem with finding font, it's shown in list of fonts, I
> could select him. The problem is that cyrillic characters picked
> from another font, while there is no problem with latin chars
On Wed, 26 May 2004, Dov Grobgeld wrote:
> It appears that the font is not properly encoded. In order for
> fontconfig (which is part of the font technology used by gimp) to
> find the glyphs they have to be encoded in their unicode positions.
> I don't know what application you used to show the f
On Wed, 26 May 2004, Sven Neumann wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Oleg Bartunov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > I'm using gimp 2.01 on my Linux machine and don't understand why some
> > truetype font ( bulgarian Kursiv ) doesn't displayed properly -
> > english letters looks as expected, but cyrillic one looks
Hi,
Oleg Bartunov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I'm using gimp 2.01 on my Linux machine and don't understand why some
> truetype font ( bulgarian Kursiv ) doesn't displayed properly -
> english letters looks as expected, but cyrillic one looks like normal serif.
> gfontview shows all characters f
Hello,
I'm using gimp 2.01 on my Linux machine and don't understand why some
truetype font ( bulgarian Kursiv ) doesn't displayed properly -
english letters looks as expected, but cyrillic one looks like normal serif.
gfontview shows all characters fine.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ xlsfonts | grep bulg