Re: (LONG) Problems with the GIMP (was: Re: [Gimp-developer]tentative GIMP 2.0 release plans)

2003-07-30 Thread Tor Lillqvist
Tor Lillqvist writes: > There also seems to be some handle leak when GIMP is starting up and > queries all the plug-ins. Also, something needs to be done to #98737 > soon. (Perhaps related, I had to start GIMP at least four times before > it got past all the plug-ins and wrote out the pluginrc

Re: (LONG) Problems with the GIMP (was: Re: [Gimp-developer]tentative GIMP 2.0 release plans)

2003-07-29 Thread Tor Lillqvist
Hans Breuer writes: > This is a regression of previous versions. IIRC it was caused > by the usage of gdk_eindow_new() with parameters 'in range' and > additional adjusted by SafeAdjustWindowRect and the code > later calling gdk_window_move with coordinates directly derived > from the current

Re: (LONG) Problems with the GIMP (was: Re: [Gimp-developer]tentative GIMP 2.0 release plans)

2003-07-29 Thread Hans Breuer
At 23:22 27.07.03 +, Tor Lillqvist wrote: [...] > >One irritating thing with GIMP on Windows currently is GTK bug >#112402, I really need to fix that soon. GIMP's toolbox and some other >windows are currently positioned with their title bar exactly off >screen. > This is a regression of previou

Re: (LONG) Problems with the GIMP (was: Re: [Gimp-developer]tentative GIMP 2.0 release plans)

2003-07-27 Thread Tor Lillqvist
Alan Horkan writes: > Any chance of binaries [for Win32] for testing? If you ask nicely, I might be presuaded to zip up what I've got... (Just built it on Win32 for the first time in a while.) > And what compiler did you use (wondering if I'll be able to get gtk-wimp > to work with the Gimp 1.

Re: (LONG) Problems with the GIMP (was: Re: [Gimp-developer]tentative GIMP 2.0 release plans)

2003-07-26 Thread Alan Horkan
On Sat, 26 Jul 2003, Michael Schumacher wrote: > Date: Sat, 26 Jul 2003 03:04:12 +0200 (MEST) > From: Michael Schumacher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: (LONG) Problems with the GIMP (was: Re: [Gimp-developer] > tentative GIMP 2.0 release

Re: (LONG) Problems with the GIMP (was: Re: [Gimp-developer]tentative GIMP 2.0 release plans)

2003-07-25 Thread Michael Schumacher
> Michael Schumacher writes: > > According to Tor Lillqvist, there was something missing from Pango > > 1.2.3 and fixed shortly after the release. > > BTW, I now made new pre-built pango-1.2.3 Win32 packages on > www.gimp.org/win32/downloads.html, with the missing exports added, so > building GI

Re: (LONG) Problems with the GIMP (was: Re: [Gimp-developer]tentative GIMP 2.0 release plans)

2003-07-25 Thread Tor Lillqvist
Michael Schumacher writes: > According to Tor Lillqvist, there was something missing from Pango > 1.2.3 and fixed shortly after the release. BTW, I now made new pre-built pango-1.2.3 Win32 packages on www.gimp.org/win32/downloads.html, with the missing exports added, so building GIMP 1.3.x for W

Re: (LONG) Problems with the GIMP (was: Re: [Gimp-developer]tentative GIMP 2.0 release plans)

2003-07-19 Thread Carol Spears
Michael Schumacher wrote: On 19 Jul 2003 at 22:13, David Neary wrote: [...] Those are the problems at the philosophical level. At the practical level, the problems are: 1) Not enough users use bugzilla to report bugs Bugzilla is powerful, but its power comes at the price of complexity...

Re: (LONG) Problems with the GIMP (was: Re: [Gimp-developer]tentative GIMP 2.0 release plans)

2003-07-19 Thread Michael Schumacher
On 19 Jul 2003 at 22:13, David Neary wrote: [...] > Those are the problems at the philosophical level. At the > practical level, the problems are: > > 1) Not enough users use bugzilla to report bugs Bugzilla is powerful, but its power comes at the price of complexity... > 2) Not enough develope