Re: [Gimp-developer] Gimp should be GIMP, but have no idea about GimpCageConfig (translation related)

2011-08-02 Thread Michael Muré 
I'm afraid I don't have a better answer than "pippin told me this".

If nobody object in the next few days, I will unmark them for translation.

2011/8/2 Martin Nordholts 

> 2011/8/2 Michael Muré :
> >> #: ../app/gegl/gimpoperationcagecoefcalc.c:82
> >> #: ../app/gegl/gimpoperationcagetransform.c:118
> >> msgid "A GimpCageConfig object, that define the transformation"
> >
> > For now, this string won't go to the UI, but it might happen in the
> future,
> > when gegl will be integrated, so I keep it marked for translation.
>
> Hi Michael,
>
> I strongly doubt it would make sense to bother our users with names of
> GObject classes, could you elaborate on why we should do this?
>
> Best regards,
> Martin
>
>
> --
>
> My GIMP Blog:
> http://www.chromecode.com/
> "GIMP 2.8 schedule on tasktaste.com"
>



-- 
Michael
___
Gimp-developer mailing list
Gimp-developer@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU
https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer

Re: [Gimp-developer] Gimp should be GIMP, but have no idea about GimpCageConfig (translation related)

2011-08-02 Thread Martin Nordholts 
2011/8/2 Michael Muré :
>> #: ../app/gegl/gimpoperationcagecoefcalc.c:82
>> #: ../app/gegl/gimpoperationcagetransform.c:118
>> msgid "A GimpCageConfig object, that define the transformation"
>
> For now, this string won't go to the UI, but it might happen in the future,
> when gegl will be integrated, so I keep it marked for translation.

Hi Michael,

I strongly doubt it would make sense to bother our users with names of
GObject classes, could you elaborate on why we should do this?

Best regards,
Martin


-- 

My GIMP Blog:
http://www.chromecode.com/
"GIMP 2.8 schedule on tasktaste.com"
___
Gimp-developer mailing list
Gimp-developer@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU
https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer

Re: [Gimp-developer] Gimp should be GIMP, but have no idea about GimpCageConfig (translation related)

2011-08-02 Thread Michael Muré 
Hi,

Sorry for the late reply.

2011/7/29 Cristian Secară 

> First of all, I think that Gimp should be GIMP in these strings:
>
> #: ../app/gegl/gimpoperationcagecoefcalc.c:65
> msgid "Compute a set of coefficient buffer for the Gimp cage tool"
>
> #: ../app/gegl/gimpoperationcagetransform.c:104
> msgid "Convert a set of coefficient buffer to a coordinate buffer for
> the Gimp cage tool"
>

Fixed in git master.


> Second, I don't know what to do with the GimpCageConfig; is this
> something that is supposed to be known by a normal user ? It should be
> not translated ?
>
> #: ../app/gegl/gimpoperationcagecoefcalc.c:82
> #: ../app/gegl/gimpoperationcagetransform.c:118
> msgid "A GimpCageConfig object, that define the transformation"
>

For now, this string won't go to the UI, but it might happen in the future,
when gegl will be integrated, so I keep it marked for translation.

Thanks for the report !

-- 
Michael
___
Gimp-developer mailing list
Gimp-developer@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU
https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer