Re: [Gimp-developer] Gimp should be GIMP, but have no idea about GimpCageConfig (translation related)
Hi, Sorry for the late reply. 2011/7/29 Cristian Secară li...@secarica.ro First of all, I think that Gimp should be GIMP in these strings: #: ../app/gegl/gimpoperationcagecoefcalc.c:65 msgid Compute a set of coefficient buffer for the Gimp cage tool #: ../app/gegl/gimpoperationcagetransform.c:104 msgid Convert a set of coefficient buffer to a coordinate buffer for the Gimp cage tool Fixed in git master. Second, I don't know what to do with the GimpCageConfig; is this something that is supposed to be known by a normal user ? It should be not translated ? #: ../app/gegl/gimpoperationcagecoefcalc.c:82 #: ../app/gegl/gimpoperationcagetransform.c:118 msgid A GimpCageConfig object, that define the transformation For now, this string won't go to the UI, but it might happen in the future, when gegl will be integrated, so I keep it marked for translation. Thanks for the report ! -- Michael ___ Gimp-developer mailing list Gimp-developer@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer
Re: [Gimp-developer] Gimp should be GIMP, but have no idea about GimpCageConfig (translation related)
2011/8/2 Michael Muré batolet...@gmail.com: #: ../app/gegl/gimpoperationcagecoefcalc.c:82 #: ../app/gegl/gimpoperationcagetransform.c:118 msgid A GimpCageConfig object, that define the transformation For now, this string won't go to the UI, but it might happen in the future, when gegl will be integrated, so I keep it marked for translation. Hi Michael, I strongly doubt it would make sense to bother our users with names of GObject classes, could you elaborate on why we should do this? Best regards, Martin -- My GIMP Blog: http://www.chromecode.com/ GIMP 2.8 schedule on tasktaste.com ___ Gimp-developer mailing list Gimp-developer@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer
Re: [Gimp-developer] Gimp should be GIMP, but have no idea about GimpCageConfig (translation related)
I'm afraid I don't have a better answer than pippin told me this. If nobody object in the next few days, I will unmark them for translation. 2011/8/2 Martin Nordholts ense...@gmail.com 2011/8/2 Michael Muré batolet...@gmail.com: #: ../app/gegl/gimpoperationcagecoefcalc.c:82 #: ../app/gegl/gimpoperationcagetransform.c:118 msgid A GimpCageConfig object, that define the transformation For now, this string won't go to the UI, but it might happen in the future, when gegl will be integrated, so I keep it marked for translation. Hi Michael, I strongly doubt it would make sense to bother our users with names of GObject classes, could you elaborate on why we should do this? Best regards, Martin -- My GIMP Blog: http://www.chromecode.com/ GIMP 2.8 schedule on tasktaste.com -- Michael ___ Gimp-developer mailing list Gimp-developer@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer
