Hi,
Daniel Egger [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I just played around with the blend tool on a 100x100px image and
looked very closely for any artifacts with and without
supersampling. The result was that I couldn't produce any visible
aliasing effects no matter how hard I try other than by using
On 02.03.2005, at 13:29, Sven Neumann wrote:
Sorry, but I don't see your point. It has been show that supersampling
makes sense for some corner cases. It is off by default and users can
activate it in case they run into one of the corner cases. Of course
it could be faster but where's your
Hi,
Daniel Egger [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
No problem on this side of the wire other then that is feature
is counterintuitive, slow, undocumented and pretty much useless
for the blend tool except for deliberate cases.
I agree that it is slow, but it is certainly not counterintuitive, it
is
On 01.03.2005, at 16:42, GSR - FR wrote:
GSR (?) already gave such an example.
It might be worth considering only supersampling when the end of a
segment is
a different color than the start of the next one.
Supersampling is to avoid aliasing, which is not caused only by those
discontinuities but
On Tue, 2005-03-01 at 22:48 +0100, Daniel Egger wrote:
On 01.03.2005, at 16:42, GSR - FR wrote:
GSR (?) already gave such an example.
It might be worth considering only supersampling when the end of a
segment is
a different color than the start of the next one.
Supersampling is to
