Garry R. Osgood wrote:
> Robin Rowe wrote:
>
> Are the FreeBSD, Solaris, IRIX and OS/2 efforts truly internal to GIMP,
Yes. In theory, at least. However, we do suffer from a lack of
developers on those platforms, so it's possible to get into the
"all the world's a VAX" syndrome... the Win32 devel
Robin Rowe wrote:
Are the FreeBSD, Solaris, IRIX and OS/2 efforts truly internal to GIMP,
> treated more like a cousin as with GimpWin, or totally independent efforts
> like MacGimp and Film Gimp?
>
> I only find Linux, Solaris, and Windows binaries on ftp.gimp.org. Where on
> the GIMP Web site i
Tor,
> I agree that with Sven that it's wrong to call GIMP for Windows a
> separate project.
What makes it seem a project is that it has a separate Web page, separate
mailing lists, and a well known project leader (you). However, as you now
say otherwise, I have updated the Web page accordingly.
Sven,
> The whole point here is that instead of a collaborative effort to
> provide some urgently needed information about the GIMP projects, you
> just went ahead and put something into public space. It would have
> been a lot better to prepare a draft and discuss it on the appropriate
> lists be
On Wed, 11 Dec 2002 09:06:29 -0800, "Robin Rowe" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Raphaël,
> > It looks like you have a bad opinion
> > of the GIMP developers, but I hope that you will change your mind
>
> Although it doesn't improve my opinion that you lead with a personal attack
> misrepresentin
Raphaël,
> It looks like you have a bad opinion
> of the GIMP developers, but I hope that you will change your mind
Although it doesn't improve my opinion that you lead with a personal attack
misrepresenting my throughts, I do not in general have a "bad opinion" of
GIMP developers. I do find
