Hi,
Seth Burgess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Well, 1.2.x is for bugfixes to 1.2, so the question is
> whether its considered a bug. I'm inclined to
> consider it one, but I'm not really doing much in the
> way of maintaining the 1.2 branch. Yosh, Sven?
Since it does not break the existing A
Well, 1.2.x is for bugfixes to 1.2, so the question is
whether its considered a bug. I'm inclined to
consider it one, but I'm not really doing much in the
way of maintaining the 1.2 branch. Yosh, Sven?
Seth
--- Tamito KAJIYAMA
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi again,
>
> I've noticed that the n
Hi again,
I've noticed that the new procedure gimp-levels-auto I've added
does not yield exactly the same effect of the Auto button in the
levels dialog. So, here is the revised patch to the GIMP 1.2.1
source tree.
BTW, I'd like to know if the patch is likely to be integrated
into the GIMP. If
Seth Burgess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
|
| I agree about your goal of exporting all functionality
| through the PDB.
|
| However, the *_cmds.c files are auto-generated by the
| tool pdbgen. Changing the files in the pdb directory
| would be the proper fix; your patch requires someone
| to rev
On Tue, 20 Mar 2001, Seth Burgess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I agree about your goal of exporting all functionality
> through the PDB.
>
> However, the *_cmds.c files are auto-generated by the
> tool pdbgen. Changing the files in the pdb directory
> would be the proper fix; your patch requires
Hi Tamito,
I agree about your goal of exporting all functionality
through the PDB.
However, the *_cmds.c files are auto-generated by the
tool pdbgen. Changing the files in the pdb directory
would be the proper fix; your patch requires someone
to reverse engineer what you've changed and add it
