Due to the size of the patches i am not including them in the mailing.
I have uploaded them to ftp.gimp.org/incoming
and made them available at
http://210.169.82.50/gimp-patches.tar.bz2
There are 13 patches for preview modes in various plugins
and one patch for save as filter, GTM, to add a dif
Yeah !!!
Due to the size of the patches i am not including them in the mailing.
I have uploaded them to ftp.gimp.org/incoming
and made them available at
http://210.169.82.50/gimp-patches.tar.bz2
There are 13 patches for preview modes in various plugins
and one patch for save as filter, GTM, t
Hi
In Gimp source code, there are many lines like
-
static ProcRecord channel_ops_offset_proc;
static ProcRecord channel_ops_duplicate_proc;
...
void
register_channel_ops_procs (void)
{
procedural_db_register (&channel_ops_offset_proc)
This is a bug I originally reported last fall. It's still alive in
version 1.1.22. The bug manifests when trying to perform a screenshot
(/File/Acquire/Screen Shot). Usually the first screenshot
works with no problem. However, if I try several screenshots one after
another (around 5-6 of 'em)
CodeWarrior is correct in its message. The variables are being defined the
first time for use in the procedural_db_register() calls and then later
they are defined again but this time with initial values. Does CodeWarrior
issue the redefinition message as a warning or as an error?
The output from
>CodeWarrior is correct in its message. The variables are being defined the
>first time for use in the procedural_db_register() calls and then later
>they are defined again but this time with initial values. Does CodeWarrior
>issue the redefinition message as a warning or as an error?
In CWPro 5.
Hi,
> >Even though -Wall is specified, gcc accepts it without even a warning. I
> >don't know offhand if this behaviour is allowed by the standard. My
> >personal coding style would put the declaration with initial values before
> >the first use which would eliminate the two lines at the top of t
Hello all,
Does anyone know where I can find prebuilt packages of GTK+1.2.7 and GLib-1.2.7 for
Redhat 6.2?
Thanks.
Pierre
What is the status of the help system these days?
Is there a help browser procedure which calls on extension_web_browser
if the gtkxhtml browser is not available?
How does the help system work for 3rd party plug-ins and scripts?
Do we need a grassroots effort to fill in the help files, or do Ka
