Re: Call for plugin maintainance / gflare

2000-01-07 Thread Martin Weber

I ported Gflare to GIMP 1.1.x with additional help of Daniel Egger.
Currently there is only one bug I know: When clicking on edit you get a
warning message. I couldn't find the reason why. Please do not remove
this plugin from GIMP but help to fix this small problem.

Martin



Re: Call for plugin maintainance

2000-01-06 Thread Daniel . Egger

On  4 Jan, Sven Neumann wrote:

 on our way from 1.0 to 1.2 we included a few plug-ins that were 
 considered not to be stable enough to be included with a stable 
 release. This was done in the hope that the inclusion into the 
 1.1 developement tree would encourage people to work on those
 plug-ins so that they would become stable enough to be released
 with 1.2. 

 Hm, there are two thing that are really annoying me:

 -megawidget
 -libgck

 libgtk, libgdk and libgimp should provide all methods which are
 necessary to build plug-ins. If they do (and I think they do) then
 there's no reason for existance of these kludges and they should be
 removed. If they don't we should integrate the necessary functionality
 into libgimp and thus provide a straightforward and common way to build
 plug-ins...

 Yosh: Will these changes have any chance to get into the tree soon
 if I'm providing the necessary patches? 

-- 

Servus,
   Daniel



Call for plugin maintainance

2000-01-04 Thread Sven Neumann

Hi,

on our way from 1.0 to 1.2 we included a few plug-ins that were 
considered not to be stable enough to be included with a stable 
release. This was done in the hope that the inclusion into the 
1.1 developement tree would encourage people to work on those
plug-ins so that they would become stable enough to be released
with 1.2. 

IMO the time has come to doublecheck what plug-ins do fulfill 
our needs. We have a lot of unmaintained plug-ins in the 
distribution. Most of them are however quite small, so fixing
a bug or doing small changes (like adding gettext support for
example) is not too difficult. However there are a few quite
large plug-ins (partially written with obscure coding schemes) 
in our distribution. Some of them are actively developed and 
maintained by their authors. But unfortunately we have some 
obviously abandoned projects in our tree.

My proposal (and I don't think that anyone can really object
against it, since it is the only reasonable way to go) is that 
we search maintainers for those plug-ins and if we don't find 
someone feeling responsible we move the plug-in out of the 
stable tree as soon as a bug is found.

I'm not yet sure how this should be organized. I will try to
build a complete list of all plug-ins with some information 
like number of files, codesize, original author, current 
maintainer and post it here later. Hopefully some people will
volunteer to take responsibilities for the abandoned projects.

I propose that this list gets included with the distribution
so that people know who to contact. 



Salut, Sven

PS: Before I come back with the proposed list, here are some 
of the plug-ins that I know are broken but too big to fix 
easily: 

FractalExplorer
GFlare
GFig (should at least be cleaned up, the code is one 320k file)
libgck (we should get rid of this one or at least rename it)
Lighting (has some bugs/disabled features in the preview code)







Re: Call for plugin maintainance

2000-01-04 Thread Tom Bech

Sven Neumann wrote:
[snip sensible idea]

 libgck (we should get rid of this one or at least rename it)
 Lighting (has some bugs/disabled features in the preview code)


delurk

These two are "mine". I have been unable to keep them
up to date the last year due to graduating and getting
lost in the demands of the Real World (tm).

During this year I've gotten two or three mails about the
Lighting plug-in, mostly concerning the broken zooming
- which should not be too difficult to fix. None about crashes.
I would be grateful if those who do find (fatal) bugs drop me
a mail about it, I don't have the time at the moment to actively
search for bug reports.

GCK is AFAIK only used in "my" plug-ins (lic, mapobject, lighting)
- I will rewrite them to "pure" G* as soon as I find the time.

If someone feels like more actively maintaining the mentioned
plug-ins, feel free (and let me know) - I may still do some work on
them from time to time, but I can't guarantee it.

Best regards,

Tom

/delurk



Re: Call for plugin maintainance

2000-01-04 Thread Tom Bech

I wrote:
[snip]
 
 - which should not be too difficult to fix. None about crashes.


Of course, this turns out to be a blatant lie. For the record; 
I did, in fact, get one such mail - the issue was resolved though.

So there. My conscience is now clean. ;)

Tom