Re: Gimp on MacOS

2000-07-23 Thread kelly

On Fri, 21 Jul 2000 16:09:31 -0400, "Jason T. Slack" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:

>A question: (An odd question) How did GIMP get permission to use the
>same Icons in the toolbox as Photoshop. Did they have to goto Adobe
>and get permission?

They just look the same.  Doctrine of merger would probably apply
(there's only so many ways to draw a paintbrush).

Kelly



Re: Gimp on MacOS

2000-07-21 Thread Zachary Beane

On Fri, Jul 21, 2000 at 04:53:51PM -0400, Jason T. Slack wrote:
> > Who says the icons are the same?  Take a _really_ close look at both
> > http://www.adobe.com/products/photoshop/images/interface.gif and the
> > gimp toolbox.  Mostly the only difference is the shading in the gimp
> > icons, but I suppose all you need is one pixel different.  Who would
> > Adobe sue if there is a copywrite infringment?  The president of gnu
> > organization?  Hmm...
> 
> This topic came up in course of conversation at my office today. A few
> individuals thought that the icons were copied from photoshop. So I thought
> I would ask to see if that was true.

Adobe Photoshop (and many other programs) use the Mac standard UI
icons for a lot of elements. Take a look at MacPaint sometime, for
example. So they aren't Adobe icons, actually, they're Apple icons...

Zach
-- 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Zachary Beane http://www.xach.com/



Re: Gimp on MacOS

2000-07-21 Thread Jason T. Slack

> Who says the icons are the same?  Take a _really_ close look at both
> http://www.adobe.com/products/photoshop/images/interface.gif and the
> gimp toolbox.  Mostly the only difference is the shading in the gimp
> icons, but I suppose all you need is one pixel different.  Who would
> Adobe sue if there is a copywrite infringment?  The president of gnu
> organization?  Hmm...

This topic came up in course of conversation at my office today. A few
individuals thought that the icons were copied from photoshop. So I thought
I would ask to see if that was true.

You are correct they are different, just by shading.

Jason





Re: Gimp on MacOS

2000-07-21 Thread Guillermo S. Romero / Familia Romero

>How did GIMP get permission to use the same Icons in the toolbox as
>Photoshop. Did they have to goto Adobe and get permission?

IIRC they are all made by Tigert. This is like Adobe Helvetica and MS Arial,
similar look but not the same thing. Please correct me if I am wrong.

GSR
 




Re: Gimp on MacOS

2000-07-21 Thread Jason T. Slack

A question: (An odd question)

How did GIMP get permission to use the same Icons in the toolbox as
Photoshop. Did they have to goto Adobe and get permission?

Jason




Re: Gimp on MacOS

2000-07-21 Thread Charles Iliya Krempeaux

Hello,

As far as webspace, there are a few places that will host free and
open source projects:

  SourceForge
  http://sourceforge.net/

  OpenAvenue
  http://www.openavenue.com/

  Netpedia
  http://www.netpedia.net/

  Lusis
  http://www.lusis.org/

  SEUL
  http://www.seul.org/

I'm pretty sure there are more too.  (SourceForge seems to be the
best known and most popular.)

As far as the Win32 GIMP page on Gimp.org... it is only mirrored there,
not hosted.  The real URL for the page is...

  http://user.sgic.fi/~tml/gimp/win32/

But, as a shortcut, you can type...

  http://www.gimp.org/win32


When you produce some code, I'd imagine that those at gimp.org would
be happy to link to you.

See ya

 Charles Iliya Krempeaux

"Jason T. Slack" wrote:
> 
> I have checked out the current projects and they seem dead. I e-mailed the
> project admins and it seems that we would be going in totally different
> directions with our development.
> 
> What would everybody think about an OS-X native version of gimp?
> 
> Does anybody know if Gimp.org will put me on their page and give me some
> space for the page? I think they did for the Windows ports.
> 
> Jason



Re: Gimp on MacOS

2000-07-21 Thread Carl B. Constantine

On 7/21/2000 06:24, Jason T. Slack at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

> I have checked out the current projects and they seem dead. I e-mailed the
> project admins and it seems that we would be going in totally different
> directions with our development.
> 
> What would everybody think about an OS-X native version of gimp?

As a mac geek as well as a Linux Geek, I'd love to see this. I can't afford
Photoshop on the Mac nad there really is no other tool that compares. I say
go for it.

I don't have Mac OS X right now or I'd help you out.

-- 

__   _   Carl B. Constantine
   / /  (_)__  __   __  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  / /__/ / _ \/ // /\ \/ /  (2.2.14)http://www.pobox.com/~macman
 //_/_//_/\_ _/ /_/\_\  Stormix 2000
PGP key available on request
  VLUG - Victoria Linux Users GroupICQ: 26351441






Re: Gimp on MacOS

2000-07-21 Thread Michael Natterer

On Fri, 21 Jul 2000, Jason T. Slack wrote:

> I have checked out the current projects and they seem dead. I e-mailed the
> project admins and it seems that we would be going in totally different
> directions with our development.
> 
> What would everybody think about an OS-X native version of gimp?

Hi,

I think this is actually a *very* good idea. However, as I said before,
there will be almost nothing to "port" because porting it will mostly
mean porting Gtk+. GIMP itself should compile out of the box on OS-X's
BSD interface.

BTW, it sould be much easier to port Gtk 1.3 to OS-X because it
already provides a Gdk frontend-backend separation for different
windowing systems. Once this is done it shouldn't be too hard to
port Gimp 1.2 to Gtk+ 2.0 (which should be done anyway after Gtk 2.0
is out or usable because Gimp 2.0 is still pure science fiction).

ciao,
--Mitch




Gimp on MacOS

2000-07-21 Thread Jason T. Slack

I have checked out the current projects and they seem dead. I e-mailed the
project admins and it seems that we would be going in totally different
directions with our development.

What would everybody think about an OS-X native version of gimp?

Does anybody know if Gimp.org will put me on their page and give me some
space for the page? I think they did for the Windows ports.

Jason




Re: Gimp on MacOS

2000-07-20 Thread Charles Iliya Krempeaux

Hello,

"Jason T. Slack" wrote:
> 
> I use Metrowerks, but not Powerplant, I am used to straight C already.
> 
> Does Gimp run on Linux PPC or just x86?

It's written in C, so it is CPU independent.  (I will basically run on anything
you can compile the C code on.  Most CPUs, including the PPC family and x86 family,
have C compilers.)  (Of course you still have to port it over to the MacOS operating
system.  The GIMP already run on Linux for PPC,... but that's a different story.)

> I e-mailed the guy who wants to port gimp to MacOS X to get his thoughts as
> he is not a programmer.
> 
> Does anybody want to see Gimp on Mac OS or OS X?

I have friends who use Mac, and want to use the GIMP on it (after seeing it on
Linux).  I try to get them to use Linux, but they won't until Linux gets a good
non-linear movie editor.  (That's part of the reason I'm working on matterial:
http://matterial.sourceforge.net/ )  So they stay with Mac because of Final Cut.

If you set up a webpage, mailing list, or anything for it, let me know please.

See ya

 Charles Iliya Krempeaux



Re: Gimp on MacOS

2000-07-20 Thread egger

On 20 Jul, Jason T. Slack wrote:

> I use Metrowerks, but not Powerplant, I am used to straight C already.
>  Does Gimp run on Linux PPC or just x86?

 Gimp runs fine on any >16bit machine. If there problems they're mostly
 caused by some scary compilers 

-- 

Servus,
   Daniel




Gimp on MacOS

2000-07-20 Thread Jason T. Slack

I use Metrowerks, but not Powerplant, I am used to straight C already.

Does Gimp run on Linux PPC or just x86?

I e-mailed the guy who wants to port gimp to MacOS X to get his thoughts as
he is not a programmer.

Does anybody want to see Gimp on Mac OS or OS X?

Jason