Re: [gimp-devel] New Plugins

2001-01-01 Thread Simon Budig
Tuomas Kuosmanen ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > Speaking of old stuff to be ported to 1.2.. If I remember correctly, the 0.54 > version (yes, kids. It did exist and it ruled.) had antialiased Threshold > tool. Hmm - i just compiled gimp 0.54 and did not manage to find *any* threshold function. Can

Re: [gimp-devel] New Plugins

2000-12-30 Thread Tuomas Kuosmanen
On Fri, Dec 29, 2000 at 05:48:07PM +0100, thus said Simon Budig: > Martin Weber ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > > Now that we have the new gimp 1.2.0 out, we should think about adding > > new plugins to the gimp. Here my proposal: Speaking of old stuff to be ported to 1.2.. If I remember correctly,

Re: [gimp-devel] New Plugins

2000-12-29 Thread Marc Lehmann
On Fri, Dec 29, 2000 at 05:48:07PM +0100, Simon Budig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > warp-sharp.scm > > Do you think it is useful to duplicate the same functionality, just because > it is implemented in two different Languages? maybe we should trade warp-sharp.pl in for the scheme original? --

Re: [gimp-devel] New Plugins

2000-12-29 Thread Simon Budig
Martin Weber ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > Now that we have the new gimp 1.2.0 out, we should think about adding > new plugins to the gimp. Here my proposal: Basically the number of plugins distributed with the gimp will most probably shrink. We are thinking about a new scheme of distributing plug