Tuomas Kuosmanen ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Speaking of old stuff to be ported to 1.2.. If I remember correctly, the 0.54
> version (yes, kids. It did exist and it ruled.) had antialiased Threshold
> tool.
Hmm - i just compiled gimp 0.54 and did not manage to find *any* threshold
function. Can
On Fri, Dec 29, 2000 at 05:48:07PM +0100, thus said Simon Budig:
> Martin Weber ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > Now that we have the new gimp 1.2.0 out, we should think about adding
> > new plugins to the gimp. Here my proposal:
Speaking of old stuff to be ported to 1.2.. If I remember correctly,
On Fri, Dec 29, 2000 at 05:48:07PM +0100, Simon Budig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > warp-sharp.scm
>
> Do you think it is useful to duplicate the same functionality, just because
> it is implemented in two different Languages?
maybe we should trade warp-sharp.pl in for the scheme original?
--
Martin Weber ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Now that we have the new gimp 1.2.0 out, we should think about adding
> new plugins to the gimp. Here my proposal:
Basically the number of plugins distributed with the gimp will most probably
shrink. We are thinking about a new scheme of distributing plug